2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and control of molecular ordering on adsorbate-induced reconstructed surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For larger height difference ͑ϳ0.5 Å or above͒, it indicates the presence or difference of interface reconstruction. 23 In addition, all observed height differences were nearly bias independent, supporting the C 60 contrast as of topographic origin. This suggests that the B-, D-, and F-C 60 have different adsorption interface structure but are identical in either the 2B1D or 1B1D phases.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…For larger height difference ͑ϳ0.5 Å or above͒, it indicates the presence or difference of interface reconstruction. 23 In addition, all observed height differences were nearly bias independent, supporting the C 60 contrast as of topographic origin. This suggests that the B-, D-, and F-C 60 have different adsorption interface structure but are identical in either the 2B1D or 1B1D phases.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…C 60 fullerides are uniquely flexible molecular materials that exhibit a rich variety of behavior 1 , including superconductivity and magnetism in bulk compounds 2, 3 , novel electronic and orientational phases in thin films [4][5][6][7][8][9] , and quantum transport in a single-C 60 transistor 10 The ability to tune competing interactions in the fullerides arises from advances in our ability to grow well-controlled heterogeneous molecular films. Here we describe measurements on potassium doped C 60 (K x C 60 ) ultra-thin films having variable thickness from one to three layers (layer index i = 1, 2, and 3) for three specific doping concentrations (x = 3, 4, and 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 25 min of evaporation, a clear change in the original LEED pattern is observed ( figure 1(c)). The symmetry (4×4) of the pattern reveals the formation of a commensurate ML of C 60 on the Cu(111) substrate [22,49], showing the LbL growth, at least up to the first ML in agreement with previous measurements using AES [8]. Increasing the film thickness, (50 min of evaporation) produces the loss of the LEED pattern ( figure 1(d)), indicating that the ordered structure is not preserved beyond the formation of the first layer.…”
Section: Growth On Cu(111) Leed Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%