Handbook of Nanofibers 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53655-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and Evaluation of Nanofiber Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By this approach, we can obtain noninvasive, high-resolution images that provide information on the morphology of the nanofibers in three dimensions with no need of sample treatment. The last aspect is relevant since techniques generally used for morphological characterization of nanofibers are often based on electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and fluorescence confocal microscopy following labeling of samples with exogenous fluorescent probes. , Although very useful, these methods often require invasive and time-consuming sample preparation prior to analysis. As shown in Figure C and in Figure S1, POTATO-72% nanofibers formed a less dense network as compared to PEA-72% and SOY-72% nanofibers at the same nominal contents of protein isolate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this approach, we can obtain noninvasive, high-resolution images that provide information on the morphology of the nanofibers in three dimensions with no need of sample treatment. The last aspect is relevant since techniques generally used for morphological characterization of nanofibers are often based on electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and fluorescence confocal microscopy following labeling of samples with exogenous fluorescent probes. , Although very useful, these methods often require invasive and time-consuming sample preparation prior to analysis. As shown in Figure C and in Figure S1, POTATO-72% nanofibers formed a less dense network as compared to PEA-72% and SOY-72% nanofibers at the same nominal contents of protein isolate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that the addition of the functionalized clay (i.e., intercalated Fe‐MMT) did not compromise the structural integrity of the composite product. It is known that, beyond a critical loading volume, clay can agglomerate and create inhomogeneous mechanical properties in the fiber (Ji et al, 2006; Roodbar Shojaei et al, 2019). It is believed that the Fe‐MMT would form highly aligned layered structures inside the fibers as the clay reorients with the stretched polymer during the electrospinning process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the charges increases in polymer solution it leads higher elongation force to jet from needle tip and induce thinner fibers [58]. It is well known that NF diameters can be affected many parameters such as molecular weight, viscosity, polarity, surface tension, surface free energy or conductivity, also electrospinning setup [59]. In this work, we did not examine these parameters after and before blending copolymer, which may be considered as the missing part of this study and beyond our main focus.…”
Section: Pcl Based and Pcl:mpeg-pei Blended Nfs Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%