2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10695-019-00655-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and expression analysis of FGF6 (fibroblast growth factor 6) genes of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) reveal their regulation on muscle growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the mrf4 linearly decreased as the dietary protein level increased, which may be explained by the mrf4 acted as a negative regulator of fiber hypertrophy as demonstrated by Moretti et al ( 29 ) using an RNA interference (RNAi) approach. In addition, fgf6a and mstn possibly play a crucial role in the regulation of muscle proliferation and hypertrophy in fish ( 30 , 31 ), which agree with the mstn and fgf6a expression level responding to the muscle growth in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Meanwhile, the mrf4 linearly decreased as the dietary protein level increased, which may be explained by the mrf4 acted as a negative regulator of fiber hypertrophy as demonstrated by Moretti et al ( 29 ) using an RNA interference (RNAi) approach. In addition, fgf6a and mstn possibly play a crucial role in the regulation of muscle proliferation and hypertrophy in fish ( 30 , 31 ), which agree with the mstn and fgf6a expression level responding to the muscle growth in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Based on the relationship between muscle cellularity and fgf6 s expression, this might suggest that the dietary DDGS mainly acts on the expression of fgf6a rather than fgf6b to regulate hypertrophy thus to improve fish growth, while fgf6b might be involved in hyperplasia. These results partially agree with (Abouel Azm et al, 2021; Campos et al, 2010; Xu et al, 2019), however, Xu et al, (2019) also suggested that fgf6b possibly had a role in muscle hypertrophic growth regulation. This differentiation deserves further confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The increase in gene expression of MRFs and mstn1 in the control group reflects the higher potential for muscle regeneration in this group, which indicates that fish body produces more muscle cells to compensate the growth depression caused by the anti‐nutritional factors such as gossypol in CSM. This could be confirmed by previous studies (Aksnes et al, 1986; Hu et al, 2019; Ulloa et al, 2013; Xu et al, 2019; Zhao et al, 2018), all of which suggested that muscle regeneration occurred in growth‐restricted fish. Upregulation of mstn gene expression in the control group compared with DDGS containing groups indicated that mstn may prevent the hypertrophy of fish muscle cells rather than differentiation, that confirmed the results by Lee and McPherron (2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Notably, native DDGS mainly act on the expression of fgf6a rather than fgf6b to regulate hyperplasia in this study. These two genes have different expression profiles in our study, in which the lower expression of fgf6a in US-imported DDGS groups was positively correlated to the muscle fiber density, while fgf6b expression showed an unsteady trend, although it was suggested that fgf6b had a function in muscle hypertrophy growth regulation ( 58 ). These distinctions in the function of fgf6 subtypes deserve more confirmation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%