2014
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2014.12.484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and field test of an in situ multi‐platform optical sensor

Abstract: The characterization and field testing of a compact in situ optical instrument using fluorescence, absorbance, and scattering to identify and quantify contaminants and natural substances in water bodies are described. The instrument, based on a technology named LEDIF (LED-Induced Fluorescence) developed by Ng et al. (2012a) was configured for in situ long-term continuous monitoring at a fixed location. The optical performance and sensing capabilities of the instrument were assessed by calibrating against labor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a non-contact system instead of the peristaltic system employed in the other applications to identify diluted materials [ 3 , 4 ], was because of the future integration of the present workbench instrumentation in the analysis-sink with open fluent water, as shown in Figure 1 b. This method is advantageous because it is clean and the LED light analyzes fluent water; however, the drawback is that it requires a higher optical output power because the HP UV-LED needs to be separated from the water in order to avoid the fluent water staining the LED lens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The choice of a non-contact system instead of the peristaltic system employed in the other applications to identify diluted materials [ 3 , 4 ], was because of the future integration of the present workbench instrumentation in the analysis-sink with open fluent water, as shown in Figure 1 b. This method is advantageous because it is clean and the LED light analyzes fluent water; however, the drawback is that it requires a higher optical output power because the HP UV-LED needs to be separated from the water in order to avoid the fluent water staining the LED lens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and the associated traffic generated implies a relevant/critical hazard for inland water. In the case of inland water pollution by hydrocarbons and other pollutants which emit fluorescence under high energy light, new developments and analyses are being conducted [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. The conventional methods used in recognizing a hydrocarbon pollutant involves transporting a sample from the area of water pollution and identifying the pollutant in the laboratory, most often using the fluorescence spectroscopic method [ 13 , 14 ].While this is an accurate method, it involves too much time for a rapid, and in some cases, programmable automatic action, to mitigate the pollution effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations