Much has been written with respect to "multi-disciplinary" studies, however, in practice the disciplines still essentially operate independently, with only the input/outputs integrating together in the workflow. This paper outlines a case study, which demonstrates the success of a much closer working relationship across the Geologic/Engineering disciplines. In particular, emphasis is placed upon the benefits of reversible workflows between Geology and Engineering throughout the entire construction process.The Field, which is the subject of the case study, is in the appraisal stage (6 well penetrations, no production) and is composed of a series of stacked Carbonate reservoirs located in shallow water offshore of the UAE. Main areas of challenge during construction of the models were; honouring observed multiple fluid contacts, lithofacies determination, 2D seismic uncertainties and non-intuitive production testing results.The vital key to resolving/matching these challenges was linking capillary pressure functions to lithofacies identifiers prior to model construction. Then throughout the construction process a series of forward/backward optimisations of geological parameters driven by both disciplines.The resultant models are simpler than those produced in the past for similar fields. However, most importantly, a number of previously mysterious observed "problems" were resolved through the necessity of a truly integrated multidisciplinary approach.This resulted in a greater understanding of reservoir properties, allowing better matching of all observed data. This in turn gives greater confidence in the predictability of the models produced.