2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4854455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and modeling of a ZnO nanowire ultraviolet photodetector with graphene transparent contact

Abstract: We report the demonstration of a ZnO nanowire ultraviolet photodetector with a top transparent electrode made of a few-layered graphene sheet. The nanowires have been synthesized using a lowcost electrodeposition method. The detector is shown to be visible-blind and to present a responsivity larger than 10 4 A/W in the near ultraviolet range thanks to a high photoconductive gain in ZnO nanowires. The device exhibits a peak responsivity at 370 nm wavelength and shows a sub bandgap response down to 415 nm explai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The R I value characterizes the ratio of generated photocurrent to incident UV intensity at a certain wavelength, RI=IphP, where I ph = I light − I dark is the photocurrent. G is defined as the ratio between the number of electrons collected per unit time and the number of absorbed photons per unit time, G=IphPhve, where hv is photon energy. The R I and G values of the hybrid‐channel FETs at various UV intensities are compared in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The R I value characterizes the ratio of generated photocurrent to incident UV intensity at a certain wavelength, RI=IphP, where I ph = I light − I dark is the photocurrent. G is defined as the ratio between the number of electrons collected per unit time and the number of absorbed photons per unit time, G=IphPhve, where hv is photon energy. The R I and G values of the hybrid‐channel FETs at various UV intensities are compared in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a drastic decrease in G occurred at low intensity, and G slowly decreased at high intensity. The lightly decrease of G at relatively high intensities was attributed to a manifestation of hole‐trap saturation and the shrinking of the depletion region . Indeed, under low‐intensity illumination, the holes that separated from photogenerated electron–hole pairs migrated to the ZnO surface and occupied surface states, then trapped at the surface and discharging adsorbed oxygen molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 In comparison with planar devices, almost defect-free semiconductor nanowires open the possibility of exploiting the photoconductive gain while avoiding the deleterious effects of grain boundaries and dislocations on the spectral response. 18 Both ZnO and (Al,Ga)N are promising choices to be used as miniature, visible-blind, ultraviolet (UV) photosensors, [11][12][13][14]16,19 but GaN presents advantages in terms of physical and chemical robustness as well as for controlled doping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanowire photoconductors are characterized by high photocurrent gains, which can reach 10 6 , and strong spectral contrast above and below the bandgap. A general feature in nanowire photoconductors is the fact that the photocurrent scales sublinearly with the impinging laser power, which has been shown for single GaN nanowires regardless of the presence of heterostructures [6][7][8][9][10], as well as for nanowires of other material systems such as ZnTe [11], ZnO [12,13], InP [14], CuO [15], and GaAs [16]. This sublinearity of the response hampers the use of such devices for quantification of the radiant fluence, and restricts their application domain to digital detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%