2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14511-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and performance evaluation of synthesized ZnO nanoflowers, nanorods, and their hybrid nanocomposites with graphene oxide for degradation of Orange G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrical energy consumption is the important contributor in the operating cost of the process. Therefore, the electrical energy per order EE/O=P*t*1000V*60*logCobold-italicC was calculated [ 50 ] and is presented in Table 4, where P is the input power (kW), V is the volume of the solution (L) in the reactor, t is the irradiation time (min), C o is the initial concentration, and C is the final concentration of the pollutant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrical energy consumption is the important contributor in the operating cost of the process. Therefore, the electrical energy per order EE/O=P*t*1000V*60*logCobold-italicC was calculated [ 50 ] and is presented in Table 4, where P is the input power (kW), V is the volume of the solution (L) in the reactor, t is the irradiation time (min), C o is the initial concentration, and C is the final concentration of the pollutant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical energy consumption is the important contributor in the operating cost of the process. Therefore, the electrical energy per order EE=O ¼ PÃtÃ1000 V Ã60Ãlog Co C was calculated [50] and is presented in Table 4, where P is the input power (kW), V is the volume of the solution (L) in the reactor, t is the irradiation time (min), C o is the For bare LF and g-CN, EE/O was calculated as 2054 and 1704 kW Á h Á m À3 , respectively, which was higher than the LF/g-CN nanocomposites. The EE/O for 1% LFCN was calculated as 916 kW Á h Á m À3 , which was lowest among all the synthesized nanocomposites of LF/g-CN.…”
Section: Electrical Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the catalyst dosag further elevated to 2 g/L, the degradation efficiency exhibited a decrease to 67.4% (Figu This observed enhancement in degradation with the initial increase in catalyst dosage 0.25 to 1 g/L, can be attributed to the greater available catalyst surface area. This incr surface area facilitated the enhanced absorption of photons, thus promoting the photoca process through the greater number of (e − , h + ) pairs, resulting in the generation of more radicals [42]. The reduction in the degradation rate beyond a catalyst dosage of 1 g/L c attributed to the increasing solution turbidity and the adverse effects associated surpassing the optimal photocatalyst dose.…”
Section: Effect Of Catalyst Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of adsorbed MG per unit mass of MOF (qt) at any time (t) was calculated using equation (1).…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among industrial sectors, textiles contribute 17-20% of industrial water pollution to the aquatic system [1]. The alarming release of hazardous chemicals into the environment is a pressing concern, particularly given the growing textile industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%