2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization and reduction of cardiac- and respiratory-induced noise as a function of the sampling rate (TR) in fMRI

Abstract: It has recently been shown that both high-frequency and low-frequency cardiac and respiratory noise sources exist throughout the entire brain and can cause significant signal changes in fMRI data. It is also known that the brainstem, basal forebrain and spinal cord area are problematic for fMRI because of the magnitude of cardiac-induced pulsations at these locations. In this study, the physiological noise contributions in the lower brain areas (covering the brainstem and adjacent regions) are investigated and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy with earlier work is potentially attributable to the inclusion of PETCO 2 signal in the model and simultaneously estimating the three response functions. Our results also show that CRF is the most consistent response across different sampling rates, similar to reported recently by Cordes et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This discrepancy with earlier work is potentially attributable to the inclusion of PETCO 2 signal in the model and simultaneously estimating the three response functions. Our results also show that CRF is the most consistent response across different sampling rates, similar to reported recently by Cordes et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The shapes of our CRF estimates are largely consistent with previous works (Chang, Cunningham et al, 2009;Cordes et al, 2014;Falahpour et al, 2013), as seen in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 3 The comparison of average activation voxels (number of voxels) and the percentage of signal change (%) at the cervical vertebra levels C5-C6 in axial plane and sagittal plane between the control group and the OSCI group Eur Spine J However, the influence of motion artifacts caused by cerebrospinal fluid fluctuation, heartbeat, and breathing was not eliminated effectively in this study, which led to occasional false activation in the CSF and muscle [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%