2010
DOI: 10.4081/ija.2010.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization, Delineation and Visualization of Agro- Ecozones Using Multivariate Geographical Clustering

Abstract: Agro-ecozoning is a delineation of landscape into relatively homogeneous regions of expected similar crop performance. Past classifications have been subjective, crop specific and did not take into account spatial correlation. A quantitative approach is proposed to unambiguously locate, characterise and visualise agro-ecozones and their boundaries which can be allied to different environmental conditions. In this study the environmental parameters, including climatic and soil characteristics, hypothesized to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven homogeneous pedologic areas represent the soil data model inputs (Figure 1a). For each homogeneous area considered, a specific pedologic profile was individuated applying a clustering procedure and a subsequent interpolation of soil data by geostatistical techniques (Castrignanò et al, 2010). Soil profile for each area was subdivided in two layers (0-40 and 41-80 cm) and described by some measured characteristics (texture, soil organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, pH in water) and hydrological parameters (soil water holding and conductivity), calculated by means of pedotransfer functions implemented into the DSSAT model.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven homogeneous pedologic areas represent the soil data model inputs (Figure 1a). For each homogeneous area considered, a specific pedologic profile was individuated applying a clustering procedure and a subsequent interpolation of soil data by geostatistical techniques (Castrignanò et al, 2010). Soil profile for each area was subdivided in two layers (0-40 and 41-80 cm) and described by some measured characteristics (texture, soil organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, pH in water) and hydrological parameters (soil water holding and conductivity), calculated by means of pedotransfer functions implemented into the DSSAT model.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downscaling procedure for P based on monthly frequencies did not produce good results (data not shown). The short length of the climate time series and its large variability related to the geographical area (Castrignanò et al, 2010;Vitale et al, 2010) may likely be the cause. In order to improve the downscaling results, we computed the winter (December, January, February; DJF), the spring (March, April, May; MAM), the summer (June, July, August; JJA) and the autumn (September, October, November SON); seasonal values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil characterization has been carried out applying a combined approach, linking multivariate geostatistical technique of cokriging with an algorithm of clustering, based on nonparametric density estimate, according to which a cluster is defined as a region surrounding a local maximum of the multivariate probability density function (Rinaldi et al, 2007a). Pedological and soil organic matter data of the rooted topsoil (0-0.40 m depth), textural and hydrological parameters, were all submitted to a normalizing transformation, and then analyzed by the multivariate geostatistical technique of cokriging (Castrignanò et al, 2010). The application of the clustering approach to the (co)kriged variables, produced the subdivision of the land into 8 distinct classes.…”
Section: The Areas Of the Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%