2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization, epitope identification and mechanisms of the anti-septic capacity of monoclonal antibodies against macrophage migration inhibitory factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that HuScFv inhibited the tautomerase activity of rMIF to a greater extent than that of native MIF may indicate the presence of other proteins containing the tautomerase activities in U937 cell lysate (2). In vitro neutralization of MIF-mediated enzymatic activity suggested the possibility of using HuScFv to reduce MIF-induced pro-inflammatory reactions, similar to the inhibitors or specific monoclonal antibodies as demonstrated in previous studies (21,43). Experiments on in vivo neutralization tests are required to evaluate anti-inflammatory activities of MIF-specific HuScFv (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The finding that HuScFv inhibited the tautomerase activity of rMIF to a greater extent than that of native MIF may indicate the presence of other proteins containing the tautomerase activities in U937 cell lysate (2). In vitro neutralization of MIF-mediated enzymatic activity suggested the possibility of using HuScFv to reduce MIF-induced pro-inflammatory reactions, similar to the inhibitors or specific monoclonal antibodies as demonstrated in previous studies (21,43). Experiments on in vivo neutralization tests are required to evaluate anti-inflammatory activities of MIF-specific HuScFv (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Whereas several small-molecule inhibitors of the biologic activity of MIF have been documented (65,69,70), to our knowledge, this is the first report to establish that an MIF antagonist, when appropriately engineered, can prevent lethal endotoxemia when administered as a single injection. Although monoclonal/polyclonal anti-MIF Abs were also found to exert protective effects (34,35,71), Nbs have an advantage in that they can be tailored into multifunctional formats as demonstrated herein. This may be particularly relevant given the recent discovery of the second CD74 ligand, MIF-2, which has a spectrum of action that is similar to that of MIF (72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…14,16,18,19,37,95 The epitope recognized by NIH/IIID.9 has not been characterized, but it has been suggested that it recognizes a solvent-exposed region of MIF in the middle part of the sequence, 95 similar to mAb clone 1C10 (Bernhagen et al, unpublished), but unlike clone F11, which blocks cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis and is directed against the Nterminal of murine MIF. 96 From the existing anti-MIF antibodies successfully tested in pre-clinical inflammation, cancer and atherosclerosis models, only the MIF antibody imalumab has so far advanced into phase 1/2a clinical trials (NCT01765790) against colorectal cancer and lupus nephritis. 97 Imalumab has an anti-inflammatory capacity as it reduces circulating TNF-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and IL-6, and attenuates disease progression in mouse models of glomerulonephritis and cancer.…”
Section: Antibody-based Anti-mif Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%