2013
DOI: 10.1071/ch13397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization Methods for Starch-Based Materials: State of the Art and Perspectives

Abstract: Improving starch-containing materials, whether food, animal feed, high-tech biomaterials, or engineering plastics, is best done by understanding how biosynthetic processes and any subsequent processing control starch structure, and how this structure controls functional properties. Starch structural characterization is central to this. This review examines how information on the three basic levels of the complex multi-scale structure of starch -individual chains, the branching structure of isolated molecules, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that the complete chain-length distribution can be used to calculate the degree of branching through the formula (Wu et al 2013b): DB ¼ P X N de ðXÞ P X XN de ðXÞ , which is an exact result arising from the definition of the degree of branching and so this quantity is not an independent structural variable, given a complete parameterization of the CLD, as done here. However, it is a useful and commonly used property, so correlations with the independent structural are listed here.…”
Section: Correlations Between Parameters For Amylopectin and Amylosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the complete chain-length distribution can be used to calculate the degree of branching through the formula (Wu et al 2013b): DB ¼ P X N de ðXÞ P X XN de ðXÞ , which is an exact result arising from the definition of the degree of branching and so this quantity is not an independent structural variable, given a complete parameterization of the CLD, as done here. However, it is a useful and commonly used property, so correlations with the independent structural are listed here.…”
Section: Correlations Between Parameters For Amylopectin and Amylosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two macromolecules are the basis of the aggregation and granule structure of starch and provide an excellent conceptual approach to the understanding of the structure-processing-property relationships of natural polymers (P erez & Bertoft, 2010;Wu, Witt, & Gilbert, 2013;Liao et al, 2014). Amylose is a linear molecular with a few long branches, whereas amylopectin is highly branched, containing~5% branching points and a large number of short branches (Damager, Engelsen, Blennow, Lindberg Møller, & Motawia, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of phosphorylase in forming enzyme complexes between different enzymes and isoforms of these (Tetlow et al, 2008;Tetlow, Morell & Emes, 2004;Tetlow et al, 2004) contributes to the action of each enzyme set. One important use of this model is that the parameters obtained by fitting (the β and h values) accurately express the whole CLD (including quite subtle features (Wu, Witt & Gilbert, 2013)) in a small number of physically meaningful parameters. This is a major improvement over representing a CLD by empirical parameterizations such as fractions in arbitrarily chosen ranges of DP.…”
Section: Fitting Amylopectin Number Clds With a Biosynthesis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%