2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.02079
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a beam-tagging hodoscope for hadrontherapy monitoring

O. Allegrini,
J. -P. Cachemiche,
C. P. C. Caplan
et al.

Abstract: A: A beam tagging hodoscope prototype made of squared 1 mm 2 fibers arranged in two perpendicular planes and coupled to multi-anode photomultipliers has been studied using 65 MeV proton as well as 95 MeV/u 12 C beams at various intensities. This hodoscope successfully provided 2D images of proton beams with a detection efficiency larger than 98% with logical OR condition between the two fiber planes. The detection efficiency with a coincidence between the two planes is close to 75% for beam intensities up to ∼… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scatterer is comprised of seven plane silicon detectors and the absorber is comprised of an array of Bi 12 GeO 20 scintillating crystals (Fontana et al, 2020;Krimmer et al, 2015). This camera is intended to be coupled to a beam hodoscope for beam-position and TOF measurement (Allegrini et al, 2021). The precision of the camera for the calculation of the Bragg peak fall-off position was compared using two different reconstruction methods: an iterative maximum likelihood expectation maximisation (MLEM) reconstruction (Maxim et al, 2015) and the analytic line-cone reconstruction (Roellinghoff et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scatterer is comprised of seven plane silicon detectors and the absorber is comprised of an array of Bi 12 GeO 20 scintillating crystals (Fontana et al, 2020;Krimmer et al, 2015). This camera is intended to be coupled to a beam hodoscope for beam-position and TOF measurement (Allegrini et al, 2021). The precision of the camera for the calculation of the Bragg peak fall-off position was compared using two different reconstruction methods: an iterative maximum likelihood expectation maximisation (MLEM) reconstruction (Maxim et al, 2015) and the analytic line-cone reconstruction (Roellinghoff et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%