Mutation in the ABL kinase domain is the principal mechanism of imatinib resistance in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Many mutations favor active kinase conformations that preclude imatinib binding. Because the active forms of ABL and SRC resemble one another, we tested two dual SRC-ABL kinase inhibitors, AP23464 and PD166326, against 58 imatinib-resistant (IM R ) BCR͞ABL kinase variants. Both compounds potently inhibit most IM R variants, and in vitro drug selection demonstrates that active (AP23464) and open (PD166326) conformation-specific compounds are less susceptible to resistance than imatinib. Combinations of inhibitors suppressed essentially all resistance mutations, with the notable exception of T315I. Guided by mutagenesis studies and molecular modeling, we designed a series of AP23464 analogues to target T315I. The analogue AP23846 inhibited both native and T315I variants of BCR͞ABL with submicromolar potency but showed nonspecific cellular toxicity. Our data illustrate how conformational dynamics of the ABL kinase accounts for the activity of dual SRC-ABL inhibitors against IM R -mutants and provides a rationale for combining conformation specific inhibitors to suppress resistance.kinase inhibitors ͉ imatinib ͉ combination chemotherapy ͉ chronic myelogenous leukemia T he small molecule protein kinase inhibitors imatinib (1-5), gefitinib (6), and erlotinib (7, 8) are susceptible to resistance in patients because of amino acid substitutions in the target protein.Imatinib inhibits BCR͞ABL by stabilizing the kinase in a catalytically inactive conformation (9). Point mutations in the ABL kinase domain can thwart drug binding by direct steric hindrance or by destabilizing the inactive kinase conformation that is required for imatinib binding (2, 3). Consequently, developing drugs that target the open or active conformation of the kinase may prove effective in rescuing patients who develop imatinib resistance.Previously, we carried out an in vitro screen for imatinib resistance and identified a large number of mutant amino acid residues outside the active site that did not appear to act by direct steric hindrance of drug binding. Several of these residues were homologous to SRC residues known to play critical roles in maintaining an assembled, autoinhibited SRC kinase conformation (10-13), and some previously had been implicated by site-directed mutagenesis in ABL kinase regulation (14,15). We reasoned that these conformational, or allosteric, mutants exerted effects on drug binding by favoring adoption of the active kinase conformation. Using inferences from the mutagenesis studies, we proposed a model for the assembled ABL kinase that closely resembled the autoinhibited SRC structure (3). Crystallographic and biochemical data published alongside our mutagenesis report confirmed that ABL indeed was regulated in a SRC-like manner (16)(17)(18).The striking similarity between the catalytically active states of the SRC and ABL kinases prompted us to investigate whether SRC kinase inhibitors might...