1986
DOI: 10.1021/ac00127a066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a diet reference material for 17 elements

Abstract: Mention of trademark or proprietary products does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply their approval to the exclusion of other products that may also be suitable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Older photometric methods are described in the literature (e.g., Burger 1973). For a comparative study of the most commonly employed methods in the analysis of biological materials, see Miller-Ihli and Wolf (1986) and Angerer and Schaller (1985). Analytical methods for Co and Ni were comprehensively reviewed by Stoeppler and Ostapczuk (1992).…”
Section: 222mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older photometric methods are described in the literature (e.g., Burger 1973). For a comparative study of the most commonly employed methods in the analysis of biological materials, see Miller-Ihli and Wolf (1986) and Angerer and Schaller (1985). Analytical methods for Co and Ni were comprehensively reviewed by Stoeppler and Ostapczuk (1992).…”
Section: 222mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resonance lines for the elements Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, Se, Sn, V and Zn could thus be recorded simultaneously, and the calculated absorbances were all shot noise limited. Similar systems were used by several groups for many fundamental [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84] as well as applied [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95] studies, and are also described in a number of overview papers [96][97][98][99][100]. In a detailed analysis [97], O'Haver and Messman stated that the undoubted advantages, in particular flexibility and excellent background correction, were unfortunately counterbalanced by the disadvantage that for elements with resonance lines at wavelengths shorter than 250 nm LODs were significantly poorer with CS AAS than with LS AAS.…”
Section: Snelleman's Wavelength Modulation Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%