Dietary restriction (DR) is a widely conserved intervention leading to lifespan extension. Despite considerable effort, the mechanisms underlying DR remain poorly understood. In particular, it remains unclear whether DR prolongs life through conserved mechanisms in different species. Here, we show that, in the most common experimental conditions, lifespan extension by DR is abolished by providing Drosophila with ad libitum water, without altering food intake, indicating that DR, as conventionally studied in flies, is fundamentally different from the phenomenon studied in mammals. We characterize an alternative dietary paradigm that elicits robust lifespan extension irrespective of water availability, and thus likely represents a more relevant model for mammalian DR. Our results support the view that protein:carbohydrate ratio is the main dietary determinant of fly lifespan. These findings have broad implications for the study of lifespan and nutrition.aging ͉ caloric restriction ͉ dehydration ͉ longevity ͉ nutrition D ietary restriction (DR), classically defined as a reduction in nutrient availability short of malnutrition, can extend the lifespan of organisms ranging from yeast to mice (1, 2). In rodents and primates, DR delays the onset of age-related pathologies, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes (3-5). Chronic DR also elicits a number of physiological changes, including decreased circulating glucose, insulin, and cholesterol levels; reduced body mass; and compromised reproductive function (5-8). Despite the evident biomedical interest in DR, its mechanistic basis remains largely unknown, and it is unclear whether DR extends lifespan in different species through similar mechanisms (9, 10). This issue is of fundamental importance, since invertebrate model systems are especially valued for their ability to provide mechanistic clues to be tested in mammals.In mammals, food restriction is imposed by feeding the DR cohort a fraction of that ingested by the ad libitum group (2). Due to the difficulty of controlling feeding rates in invertebrates, more ingenious, albeit potentially problematic, techniques are used. Drosophila DR is commonly achieved by total food dilution (11) and carried out in the absence of a separate water source, unlike with other species (12-16). Hence, fly food is simultaneously the source of nutrients* and water. This setup prevents flies from independently regulating nutrient and water intake, leaving room for the possibility that any effects of food dilution are mediated by changes in hydration.Our results show that lifespan extension by typical DR regimes (17-20) can be entirely abolished by providing flies with free access to water. Water supplementation does not affect food consumption, suggesting that DR, as typically applied, does not impact longevity through reduced nutrient intake. Furthermore, we characterize a regime that elicits robust lifespan extension independent of water supplementation. Our findings suggest that most of the work done on Drosophila DR has b...