2009
DOI: 10.1080/02786820902922894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a Modified Expansion Condensation Particle Counter for Detection of Nanometer-Sized Particles

Abstract: A newly developed condensation particle counter provides measurements of aerosol particle number densities for size diameters as low as 3 nm. This Expansion Condensation Particle Counter (ECPC) operates based on fast adiabatic expansion with specialized detection and evaluation of the temporal development of light scattered by the ensemble of growing droplets. In its new configuration the ECPC has been modified such that a previously needed calibration factor became obsolete. In this article the new design is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first CPCs designed specifically for ultrafine particles were developed in the 1990s with a cutoff size around 3 nm (Stolzenburg and McMurry, 1991). The demand to measure even smaller particles -mainly to study atmospheric nucleation -has led to further CPC development, and by now several different instruments have been reported to measure in the sub-3 nm size range (Seto et al, 1997;Sgro and Fernandez de la Mora, 2004;Mordas et al, 2005;Kulmala et al, 2007a;Sipilä et al, 2008Sipilä et al, , 2009Iida et al, 2009;Lehtipalo et al, 2009Lehtipalo et al, , 2010Saghafifar et al, 2009;Vanhanen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first CPCs designed specifically for ultrafine particles were developed in the 1990s with a cutoff size around 3 nm (Stolzenburg and McMurry, 1991). The demand to measure even smaller particles -mainly to study atmospheric nucleation -has led to further CPC development, and by now several different instruments have been reported to measure in the sub-3 nm size range (Seto et al, 1997;Sgro and Fernandez de la Mora, 2004;Mordas et al, 2005;Kulmala et al, 2007a;Sipilä et al, 2008Sipilä et al, , 2009Iida et al, 2009;Lehtipalo et al, 2009Lehtipalo et al, , 2010Saghafifar et al, 2009;Vanhanen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first CPCs designed specifically for ultrafine particles were developed in the 1990s with a cutoff size around 3 nm (Stolzenburg and McMurry, 1991). The demand to measure even smaller particles -mainly to study atmospheric nucleation -has led to further CPC development, and by now several different instruments have been reported to measure in the sub-3 nm size range (Seto et al, 1997;Sgro and Fernandez de la Mora, 2004;Mordas et al, 2005;Kulmala et al, 2007a;Sipilä et al, 2008Sipilä et al, , 2009Iida et al, 2009;Lehtipalo et al, 2009Lehtipalo et al, , 2010Saghafifar et al, 2009;Vanhanen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working principle of a condensation particle counter is to expose the aerosol sample to a supersaturated vapour, which condenses on the particles, thereby making them large enough to be detected optically. At least three different methods have been used for creating the required supersaturation: adiabatic expansion (Saghafifar et al, 2009), thermal diffusion in a laminar flow (Stolzenburg and McMurry, 1991) or mixing of two flows with different thermodynamic properties .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Condensation particle counters measure nanomaterial number concentration in gas suspension by optical detection after growth of the particles to a detectable size through the condensation of volatile species such as butanol or water. 5 Nanomaterials may also become aggregated to different degrees in various solutions. Generally, studies to date have examined the effect of different suspension media on aggregation of nanomaterials in relation to human health effects.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%