2005
DOI: 10.1118/1.1924328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a new MOSFET detector configuration for in vivo skin dosimetry

Abstract: The dose released to the patient skin during a radiotherapy treatment is important when the skin is an organ at risk, or on the contrary, is included in the target volume. Since most treatment planning programs do not predict dose within several millimeters of the body surface, it is important to have a method to verify the skin dose for the patient who is undergoing radiotherapy. A special type of metal oxide semiconductors field-effect transistors (MOSFET) was developed to perform in vivo skin dosimetry for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the difference between the surface doses on the chest wall of the computerized treatment plan and those of the actual measurement was reported in the previous experiment, and there is a MOSFETderived ± 6 % surface-dose-measurement difference that confirms a similarity to this study [22,23]. It was shown that as the curvature of the region that the MOSFETmeasuring position is located in increases, the radiation dose increases in the same cross-section, and this tendency is attributed to the angle dependency of the MOSFET itself according to the attachment position [18,24]. In addition, we confirmed that, although the absorbed dose in the build-up area is very important for tangential irradiation, one of the radiation-therapy techniques for breast cancer, there is a radiation-dose difference that depends on the radiation-dose-calculation algorithm of the instrument that is used for the computerized treatment plan [25,26]; therefore, an additional verification of the treatment plan that uses algorithms that are different from the adaptive convolution algorithm that was used in this experiment is needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the difference between the surface doses on the chest wall of the computerized treatment plan and those of the actual measurement was reported in the previous experiment, and there is a MOSFETderived ± 6 % surface-dose-measurement difference that confirms a similarity to this study [22,23]. It was shown that as the curvature of the region that the MOSFETmeasuring position is located in increases, the radiation dose increases in the same cross-section, and this tendency is attributed to the angle dependency of the MOSFET itself according to the attachment position [18,24]. In addition, we confirmed that, although the absorbed dose in the build-up area is very important for tangential irradiation, one of the radiation-therapy techniques for breast cancer, there is a radiation-dose difference that depends on the radiation-dose-calculation algorithm of the instrument that is used for the computerized treatment plan [25,26]; therefore, an additional verification of the treatment plan that uses algorithms that are different from the adaptive convolution algorithm that was used in this experiment is needed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is no energy dependency here, and the dependency of the radiation-incidence angle is ± 2 % at an energy range of 1 MeV to 20 MeV with a 360° rotation. Also, a temperature dependency of 0.5 % exists at 20° to 40° and unlike the TLD, the influence of the temperature change is low, which is useful for the measurement of the accumulated radiation dose [18,19]. Threshold voltage (V T ) is required for a current to flow into the MOSFET and the general threshold voltage is the sum of the flat band voltage (VFB) and the ideal threshold voltage (V ideal T ), as follows:…”
Section: Measurement Of Radiation Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, MOSFETs could be suitable for in-vivo assessment of radiosurgery microbeams [7,6,8]. In the literature their use has been described extensively for such in vivo procedures as: in vivo dosimetry for external radiotherapy [9,10,11], dose verification in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) [12,13,14], measurements in head and neck Tomotherapy [15], skin dose measurement [16], entry dosimetry [17], implantable detectors for in-situ testing during radiation therapy treatment [18], dose verification of permanent low-dose-rate implants [19] and as a dosimeter for imaging in radiological procedures [20]. Additional studies have reported excellent linearity, dosimetric accuracy in the build-up region and directional independence [9,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is critical that the response of the in vivo skin dose verification system is angle-independent or its dependence is well-understood. Much research has been conducted to characterize different brands of MOSFET dosimeters (7)(8)(9)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Manufacturer reports as well as some research has shown that for MOSFETs without a buildup cap performance is relatively independent of beam incidence angle and that for MOSFETs with a buildup cap readings are relatively independent of beam incidence angle up to 45 degrees but suffer a sudden discontinuity at around 45 degrees as the buildup cap moves out of the beam path.…”
Section: Technology In Cancer Research and Treatment Volume 13 Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%