1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(98)00012-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a poly(3-methyl thiophene) film by an in-situ dc resistance measurement technique and in-situ FTIR spectroelectrochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is typical for measurements in gas phases [36,38]. The measurement with fixation of the electrode potential is performed in electrolytes [19,25,27,30,33,39]. The potential fixation can be performed directly or by using of potentiostats.…”
Section: Transducers For Artificial Receptors Based On Conducting Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is typical for measurements in gas phases [36,38]. The measurement with fixation of the electrode potential is performed in electrolytes [19,25,27,30,33,39]. The potential fixation can be performed directly or by using of potentiostats.…”
Section: Transducers For Artificial Receptors Based On Conducting Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FTIR spectroscopy peak of the doped-P3MT(0.67)/Ni nanotubes at about 1700 cm À1 could be assigned to the dangling bond or -OH group bonded to the thiophene rings after the Ni coating. [24,25] More details of the FTIR spectroscopy characteristic peaks of the doped-P3MT nanotubes and the HDLNTs of doped-P3MT/Ni are presented in the Supporting Information. Figure 6a compares the normalized UV-vis absorption spectra of the HDLNTs (curves with larger symbols) of P3MT/ Ni and the doped-P3MT nanotubes (thin curves) with different doping levels (from Fig.…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Conductivity is a very important parameter in discussing the conduction mechanism. Conductivity can be measured by ex-situ 2 and in-situ 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] techniques. A common and attractive feature of conducting polymers is a drastic change of conductivity induced by chemical or electrochemical doping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation of ex-situ technique is the lack of information about the behavior of the conductivity as a function of the doping state. Therefore, in-situ two-probe method has been widely used, 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] where the resistance is measured by applying a small bias voltage between the two electrodes and measuring the current between them. Thus measured resistance includes not only the polymer resistance but also the contact resistance, which might make a big error in conductivity measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%