1988
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a Ranked-Set Sample with Application to Estimating Distribution Functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The properties ofF RSS (t) have been studied by Stokes and Sager [11]. They proved that this estimator is unbiased and has less variance than empirical distribution function (EDF) in SRS of the same size, regardless of the quality of ranking.…”
Section: The Cdf Estimation In Concomitant-based Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The properties ofF RSS (t) have been studied by Stokes and Sager [11]. They proved that this estimator is unbiased and has less variance than empirical distribution function (EDF) in SRS of the same size, regardless of the quality of ranking.…”
Section: The Cdf Estimation In Concomitant-based Rssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they showed that the efficiency ofȲ RSS toȲ SRS is maximized when the population distribution is uniform. Stokes and Sager [11] considered the problem of estimating the cumulative distribution function (CDF), and proved that RSS CDF estimator is more efficient than its counterpart in SRS regardless of the ranking quality. Stokes [10], MacEachern et al [7] and Zamanzade and Vock [16] proposed some variance estimators based on a ranked set sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtually all of the most important and practical statistical problems are well addressed in the RSS literature. For example, the problem of estimation of a distribution function has been considered by Stokes and Sager (1988), Kvam and Samaniego (1994), and Duembgen and Zamanzade (2013). Stokes (1980), MacEachern et al (2002), Perron and Sinha (2004) and Zamanzade and Vock (2015) considered the problem of nonparametric estimation of variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RSS mean is at least as precise as the sample mean of the simple random sampling with replacement (SRSWR) sampling scheme of the same size. Stokes ( , 1980aStokes ( , 1988 showed that RSS provides precise estimators for cumulative distribution function, population variance and correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%