2006
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of a three bacteria mixed culture in a chemostat: Evaluation and application of a quantitative terminal‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (T‐RFLP) analysis for absolute and species specific cell enumeration

Abstract: Growth dynamics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia cepacia, and Staphylococcus aureus in a batch and chemostat, were investigated as a laboratory model system for persistent infections in cystic fibrosis. Most species-specific enumeration methods for mixed cultures are laborious or only qualitative, and therefore impede generation of quantitative data required for validation of mathematical models. Here, a quantitative T-RFLP method was evaluated and applied for specific and absolute cell number enumerati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…during incubation in Quanti-Trays increased the relative abundance of the target TRFs from nondetectable (in water samples) to dominant (in individual positive Quanti-Tray wells). The absence of these TRFs in the source water samples is not surprising, given the FIB concentrations in this study and published detection limits for TRFLP (ϳ10 7 CFU per 100 ml) (46). Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that where Vibrio and Lactobacillales/Clostridiales were the dominant nontarget TRFs in IDEXX enrichments, the cause was growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…during incubation in Quanti-Trays increased the relative abundance of the target TRFs from nondetectable (in water samples) to dominant (in individual positive Quanti-Tray wells). The absence of these TRFs in the source water samples is not surprising, given the FIB concentrations in this study and published detection limits for TRFLP (ϳ10 7 CFU per 100 ml) (46). Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that where Vibrio and Lactobacillales/Clostridiales were the dominant nontarget TRFs in IDEXX enrichments, the cause was growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In this study, culture-independent bacterial community analyses were used to reduce potential biases due to selective culture media. While TRFLP can have its own biases, e.g., originating during DNA extraction, PCR amplification, enzymatic restriction, and electrophoresis (22,25,41), relative changes in community structures are reliably reflected using TRFLP (25,46). Further, dominant taxa can be detected, even if the dominant taxa are not represented by the dominant TRFs (22,40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For quantitative characterization of mixed communities by T-RFLP, Trotha et al introduced an internal quantification standard [7], an 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene fragment from a known species with a defined cell number. Schmidt et al adapted this quantitative T-RFLP (qT-RFLP) method for species-specific cell enumeration of a three-species mixed model community, comprising P. aeruginosa , B. cepacia and S. aureus , relevant to infections of lung of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients [8]. Furthermore, the authors characterized the growth of these species in a defined mixed culture in chemostat cultivations, and a mathematical chemostat model was established to identify interspecies effects [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using peak areas as an indicator for absolute abundance has been confirmed to be a fruitless exercise, even when using simplified microbial communities (4,10,55). However, when experiments are performed under well-defined laboratory conditions or on simplified communities whose rrs copy numbers per genome are known, quantitative estimates of each target organism may be successfully obtained via community fingerprinting methods (27,41). A corollary of the lack of quantitativeness in community fingerprinting methods is that they may not be appropriate to assess the richness of microbial communities or to be used with diversity metrics because of their underestimation of the actual richness and because of their limited detection threshold and dynamic range (reviewed in reference 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%