2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of aconitine-induced block of delayed rectifier K+ current in differentiated NG108-15 neuronal cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, our study demonstrated that the activation kinetics of I K(DR) (i.e., K V 3.1-encoded current) in SGX-treated cells virtually became slowed in a time- and state-dependent manner. The results were in contrast with inhibitory effects of midazolam or aconitine on I K(DR) [12, 21]. These two compounds exerted inhibitory effects via a mechanism through binding to the open state of the channel followed by increased rate of I K(DR) inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, our study demonstrated that the activation kinetics of I K(DR) (i.e., K V 3.1-encoded current) in SGX-treated cells virtually became slowed in a time- and state-dependent manner. The results were in contrast with inhibitory effects of midazolam or aconitine on I K(DR) [12, 21]. These two compounds exerted inhibitory effects via a mechanism through binding to the open state of the channel followed by increased rate of I K(DR) inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Current amplitudes were increased with greater depolarizations in an outward-rectifying manner with a reversal potential of −76 ± 2 mV (n = 12). These outward currents, which were insensitive to inhibition by either iberiotoxin (200 nM) or apamin (200 nM), have been referred to as I K(DR) , the biophysical properties of which resemble the K V 3.1-encoded K + currents [12, 22]. In particular, as the cells were exposed to SGX (30 μM), the amplitude and gating of I K(DR) were altered throughout the entire range of voltage-clamp steps as compared with those taken from untreated cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pipettes used had a resistance of 3–5 MΩ when immersed in different solutions as described above. Patch-clamp recordings were made in cell-attached or whole-cell configurations using an RK-400 (Bio-Logic, Claix, France) or an Axopatch 200B patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular Devices; Sunnyvale, CA, USA) [15, 16]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the inhibitory effect of ART on I K(DR) observed in GH 3 cells can be taken into account by a state-dependent blocker that binds to the open state of K V channels according to a minimal kinetic scheme [18]. The blocking and unblocking rate constants (i.e., k +1 and k -1 ) were appropriately determined from the inactivation rate constants (i.e., 1/τ inact ) of I K(DR) elicited by the voltage steps from -50 to +50 mV with a duration of 10 sec.…”
Section: Kinetic Study Of Art Effect On I K(dr)mentioning
confidence: 99%