Expression of ␣-amylase genes in both rice suspension cells and germinating embryos is repressed by sugars and the mechanism involves transcriptional regulation. The promoter of a rice ␣-amylase gene ␣Amy3 was analyzed by both loss-and gain-of-function studies and the major sugar response sequence (SRS) was located between 186 and 82 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site. The SRS conferred sugar responsiveness to a minimal promoter in an orientation-independent manner. It also converted a sugar-insensitive rice actin gene promoter into a sugar-sensitive promoter in a dosedependent manner. Linker-scan mutation studies identified three essential motifs: the GC box, the G box, and the TATCCA element, within the SRS. Sequences containing either the GC box plus G box or the TATCCA element each mediated sugar response, however, they acted synergistically to give a high level glucose starvation-induced expression. Nuclear proteins from rice suspension cells binding to the TATCCA element in a sequence-specific and sugar-dependent manner were identified. The TATCCA element is also an important component of the gibberellin response complex of the ␣-amylase genes in germinating cereal grains, suggesting that the regulation of ␣-amylase gene expression by sugar and hormone signals may share common regulatory machinery.Sugar repression of gene expression is a fundamental and ubiquitous regulatory system for adjusting to changes in nutrient availability in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In microorganisms, glucose or other rapidly metabolizable carbon sources repress the expression of genes that code for enzymes related to the metabolism of other carbon sources. Our understanding of the mechanisms of sugar repression has been based largely on studies of microorganisms. In the case of Escherichia coli, a model to explain at the molecular level, the mechanism of sugar repression has been determined (1, 2). The mechanism of glucose repression in yeast is more complicated and is less understood than it is in E. coli (3-5). Studies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants have revealed many of the components involved in the response to carbon catabolite repression (5), but it is still unclear how all of these components interact to regulate transcription. A universal signaling pathway which leads to the regulation of all glucose-repressible genes has yet to be determined.As in microorganisms, sugar repression of gene expression also allows plant cells to cope effectively with changes in the carbon sources present in their environment. However, in multicellular plants, feedback repression by excess sugars provides an additional mechanism for maintaining an economical balance between supply (source) and demand (sink) for carbohydrate allocation and utilization among tissues and organs (6 -8). Despite the fact that sugar repression of gene expression is likely a central control mechanism mediating energy homeostasis and carbohydrate distribution in plants, the molecular mechanism of sugar feedback regulation remain...