“…However, the increase in anthropogenic food subsidies may act as an ecological trap as human-derived food has typically a poorer nutritional quality than the natural food resources (Auman et al, 2008), which may lead to a reduced growth rate and body condition (Annett and Pierotti, 1999;Pierotti and Annett, 1991). Animals exploiting these locations to forage may be susceptible to a higher exposure to contaminants, poisoning and pathogen infections (Seif et al, 2018;Sorais et al, 2020;Yorio et al, 2020), as well as an increased probability of interacting with anthropogenic debris materials such as glass, fabric, metal, paper and especially plastics (Lopes et al, 2020(Lopes et al, , 2021. In fact, coastal and more generalist seabirds such as gulls are particularly exposed to such anthropogenic materials (Kühn and van Franeker, 2020;Lopes et al, 2021) and vulnerable to the direct deleterious impacts of their ingestion, which may include the obstruction to food passage, stomach ulcers and perforations of the gastrointestinal tract, disturbance in the assimilation of nutrients, damage to tissues, morbidity and starvation (Gregory, 2009;Henry et al, 2011;Kühn et al, 2015;Lavers et al, 2014;Ryan, 1987).…”