2021
DOI: 10.1360/tb-2021-0406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of applicability domains for QSAR models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explained the low consistency rate between drought grades from drought monitoring and those based on MCI values in Tibet. In addition, drought severity seemed to be overestimated based on the MCI values [98]. (4) The Thornthwaite method was used to estimate potential evapotranspiration when SPEI values were determined using the XGBoost model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explained the low consistency rate between drought grades from drought monitoring and those based on MCI values in Tibet. In addition, drought severity seemed to be overestimated based on the MCI values [98]. (4) The Thornthwaite method was used to estimate potential evapotranspiration when SPEI values were determined using the XGBoost model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application domain (AD) of a QSAR model refers to the specific area in the response and chemical structure space where the model can make reliable predictions, and descriptors generally represent the chemical structure space. 32 The descriptor space covered by chemicals in the training sets, also known as the descriptor domain, was used as AD in this study. The distance between any two compounds in the descriptor space can represent the molecular similarity and be used to determine the boundary of the descriptor space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%