2017
DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n107rc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Biogenic, Intermediate and Physicogenic Soil Aggregates of Areas in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

Abstract: -Aggregate formation and stability are related to soil quality, contributing significantly to the carbon storage and nutrient maintenance capacities of the soil. Soil aggregates are formed by two different process: physicogenic, related to moistening and drying cycles and input of organic matter; and biogenic, related to the action of macrofauna organisms and roots. The objective this work was to classify aggregates according to their formation process, quantify and compare organic carbon contents in humic sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the relative proportion of the different pathways of aggregate formation (Table 1), other authors have found similar results for physicogenic aggregation (Loss et al, 2014;Silva Neto et al, 2016;Fernandes et al, 2017). When evaluating the proportion of aggregate formation by the different pathways in NT areas with different times of implementation and forest in two seasons in Guaíra-PR, Ferreira et al (2020) observed that the proportion of physicogenic aggregates was higher than that of intermediate and biogenic aggregates after 23 years of NT in both seasons, with the opposite pattern for the forest area.…”
Section: Proportion Of Physicogenic and Biogenic Aggregatessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the relative proportion of the different pathways of aggregate formation (Table 1), other authors have found similar results for physicogenic aggregation (Loss et al, 2014;Silva Neto et al, 2016;Fernandes et al, 2017). When evaluating the proportion of aggregate formation by the different pathways in NT areas with different times of implementation and forest in two seasons in Guaíra-PR, Ferreira et al (2020) observed that the proportion of physicogenic aggregates was higher than that of intermediate and biogenic aggregates after 23 years of NT in both seasons, with the opposite pattern for the forest area.…”
Section: Proportion Of Physicogenic and Biogenic Aggregatessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Assim como Loss et al (2014) encontraram maiores teores de nutrientes em agregados biogênicos em áreas de SPD, pastagem e floresta secundária no Paraná, Brasil, sendo nos agregados biogênicos também observado expressiva presença de coprólitos de minhocas na camada superficial do solo (0-5 cm). Outros trabalhos também constataram maiores teores de COT e nutrientes em agregados de origem biogênica em relação aos agregados de origem fisiogênica (Fernandes et al, 2017).…”
Section: /8unclassified
“…Os fisiogênicos são aqueles que apresentam formas angulares ou prismáticas e estão relacionados à aproximação das partículas unitárias do solo relativas aos ciclos de umedecimento e secagem e pela ação de agentes cimentantes do solo (matéria orgânica e, ou, óxidos e hidróxidos de ferro e alumínio), e os biogênicos apresentam formas arredondadas e estão relacionados às vias biológicas de formação, tais como a passagem pelo trato intestinal da macrofauna do solo, especialmente minhocas, e também a ação cimentante de exsudatos das raízes e da biota associada (Velasquez et al, 2012;Batista et al, 2013;Loss et al, 2014). Os agregados biogênicos, em função de serem excretas da macrofauna do solo que se alimenta basicamente de matéria orgânica, apresentam maiores teores de nutrientes, contribuem na proteção física da matéria orgânica (sequestro de carbono), e normalmente possuem maior estabilidade física em água (Silva Neto et al, 2010), o que pode alocá-los como potenciais indicadores de qualidade do solo, uma vez que são sensíveis aos diferentes sistemas de uso e manejo do solo (Loss et al, 2014;Fernandes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The distinction between types of aggregates is made according to their genesis or formation pathways based on morphological characteristics, such as shape, size, presence of roots, and porosity (Bullock et al, 1985;Pulleman et al, 2005;Batista et al, 2013a;Melo et al, 2019). Aggregates also differ in the levels of SOM, especially those formed by macrofauna and plant root activities (Loss et al, 2014;Rossi et al, 2016;Silva Neto et al, 2016;Fernandes et al, 2017;Loss et al, 2017;Pinto et al, 2018;Ventura et al, 2018;Mergen Junior et al, 2019a,b;Melo et al, 2019;Schultz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%