“…In general, negatively charged proteins (e.g., BSA/OVA at pH 5-9 as well α-CT at pH 9) selectively partition into the PEG-rich top phase, thus increasing K, while positively charged proteins (e.g., LYZ at pH 5-9 and α-CT at pH 5-8) prefer a partitioning into the salt-rich bottom phase, thus resulting in a decreasing value of K due to electrostatic interactions between protein and PEG units as a result of charge distribution [1,6,7,13,44,51,62,66,74,88]. Hence, within the requirement of electroneutrality at the interface, an increasing value of K with rising pH can be explained by considering the protein surface charge compared to its pI and the fact that negatively charged proteins, such as BSA/OVA at pH 5-9 as well as α-CT at pH 9, become more negatively charged with increasing pH due to stronger electrostatic interactions between each protein and the PEG-rich top phase which has a higher positive charge density, thus increasing K [7,44,51,62,66,82,89]. However, the investigated positively charged proteins (e.g., LYZ at pH 5-9 and α-CT at pH 5-8) tend to partition predominantly into the PEG-rich top phase with rising pH, thus increasing K. Thereby, an enhanced affinity of the positively charged α-CT/LYZ for the top phase and rising K occurs with increasing pH based on a rising salting-out effect in the bottom phase as well as enhanced hydrophobic interactions between α-CT/LYZ and PEG in the top phase due to an increased ratio of phase-forming salt ions and high surface hydrophobicity.…”