2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbde0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of breast lesions using multi-parametric diffusion MRI and machine learning

Abstract: Objective: To investigate quantitative imaging markers based on parameters from two diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) models, continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models, for characterizing malignant and benign breast lesions by using a machine learning algorithm. Approach: With IRB approval, 40 women with histologically confirmed breast lesions (16 benign, 24 malignant) underwent DWI with 11 b-values (50 to 3000 s/mm2) at 3T. Three CTRW parameters, Dm ,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed the feasibility of using metabolite ratios from 5D EP-COSI and ADC values from the DWI data of breast cancer patients to train machine learning models for classifying benign and malignant lesions. While earlier studies have attempted lesion characterization using features extracted from the DWI and DCE-MRI data, these models did not use the quantitative measures of metabolite and lipid features which can be obtained with an MRSI examination [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Although variations in water and fat levels can become ambiguous in glandular regions, especially in benign and healthy tissues, various lipid and metabolite ratios are reported to have statistically significant differences between benign and malignant lesions [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study showed the feasibility of using metabolite ratios from 5D EP-COSI and ADC values from the DWI data of breast cancer patients to train machine learning models for classifying benign and malignant lesions. While earlier studies have attempted lesion characterization using features extracted from the DWI and DCE-MRI data, these models did not use the quantitative measures of metabolite and lipid features which can be obtained with an MRSI examination [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Although variations in water and fat levels can become ambiguous in glandular regions, especially in benign and healthy tissues, various lipid and metabolite ratios are reported to have statistically significant differences between benign and malignant lesions [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the focus of this study was to analyze the performance of ML models with features from the 5D EP-COSI data, we have not considered some of the image-based features potentially available from DWI. For example, it has been recently shown that the features based on continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) models from DWI using multiple b-values can classify benign and malignant breast lesions using ensemble ML models [ 48 ]. More radiomics features from DWI as well as other modalities like DCE-MRI can be used in a future study to potentially further improve the model performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a fast, noninvasive, and non-enhancing functional imaging method and is an integral part of the clinical breast MRI protocol (10). The apparent diffusion coe cient (ADC) map derived from DWI can quantitatively measure the diffusion hindrance of water molecules in the lesion tissue and provide quantitative parameters for lesion characterization (11)(12)(13). Histogram analysis can evaluate the distribution and variation of intensity of all voxels in the lesion by extracting more objective quantitative data from medical images and thus provide richer information for lesion characterization, which has the advantages of simplicity and good reproducibility (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%