1984
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of C4 Type Leaf Anatomy in Grasses (Poaceae). Mesophyll: Bundle Sheath Area Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
104
0
6

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
104
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that after a short activation phase, RuBPCase activity was nearly stable for 20 min. We observed that the loss of RuBPCase activity during incubation for activation proceeded at a constant rate for at least 13 (Table II). This was expected, as these genotypes differed in these traits in field-grown plants (2,3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They reported that after a short activation phase, RuBPCase activity was nearly stable for 20 min. We observed that the loss of RuBPCase activity during incubation for activation proceeded at a constant rate for at least 13 (Table II). This was expected, as these genotypes differed in these traits in field-grown plants (2,3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…2, left). Interveinal distance (106 mm), M thickness (100 mm), BS/M area (0.26), and the resulting BS side (46 mm) were averaged from the literature (Hattersley, 1984;Usuda, 1985;Bongard-Pierce et al, 1996;Moreno-Sotomayor et al, 2002;Kromdijk et al, 2010). Because of the square anatomy, the leaf light environment could be described by two light profiles: P1 and P2.…”
Section: Estimated Ab Bs/mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such enablers may include ecological factors, as well as genomic and anatomical properties (10). For optimal functioning of the C 4 pathway, foliar anatomy must be altered to increase the relative proportion of BS cells and reduce the average path length between M and BS cells (12)(13)(14)(15). These modifications guarantee an efficient centripetal increase of CO 2 concentration, but they also imply that C 4 evolution involved many mutations, unless the C 3 ancestors already possessed some C 4 -like anatomical characters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%