2015
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of CEBPA Mutations and Polymorphisms and their Prognostic Relevance in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metzeler et al report were the only study in line with our findings (Metzeler et al, 2011). Regarding our analyses, the TET2mut did not show any correlation with FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA expression levels (Ishfaq et al, 2012;Sarojam et al, 2015;Alarbeed et al, 2021). Since the previous studies evaluated the molecular prognostic markers through the sequencing method, this discrepancy might be caused by the difference in method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Metzeler et al report were the only study in line with our findings (Metzeler et al, 2011). Regarding our analyses, the TET2mut did not show any correlation with FLT3, NPM1 and CEBPA expression levels (Ishfaq et al, 2012;Sarojam et al, 2015;Alarbeed et al, 2021). Since the previous studies evaluated the molecular prognostic markers through the sequencing method, this discrepancy might be caused by the difference in method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Intriguingly, without any microscopically detectable chromosome abnormalities in its leukemic blast, CN-AML harbour aberrantly expressed genes and microRNAs, mutations, epigenetic changes that can be used as potential prognostic markers (8). It is now recognized that WT1, ASXL1, DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD and TET2 mutations presence in CN-AML represent a subgroup of patients with unfavorable prognosis, while NPM1 and CEBPA are associated with favorable prognosis (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). Furthermore, unfavorable prognostic factors include high expression of CPT1A, ATP1B1, RUNX1, MAPKBP1, MAP7, ERG, DNMT3B, miR-3151, miR-155, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, CEBPA sm AMLs frequently harbor mutations in genes, such as NPM1, FLT3, or ASXL1. 78,79 Thus, these mutant genes seem to collaborate with single mutations in CEBPA (mostly N-terminal) to drive AML. An additional line of evidence to this statement is observed in families with germline N-terminal CEBPA sm .…”
Section: Mutant C/ebpa As a Driver Of Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%