2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of chemotaxis and motility response towards fructose in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify this conjecture, we carried out swimming motility assays, and found that the diameter of the swimming zone of the degS mutant on motility plates was significantly smaller than that of the WT strain ( Figure 1B ; Supplementary Figure 1 ). Subsequently, we performed a chemotaxis assay using three widely utilized attractants, namely 50 mM fructose ( Liu et al, 2020b ), 100 mM serine ( l -ser; Roggo et al, 2018 ), and 100 μM aspartic acid ( l -Asp; Long et al, 2017 ). Either with or without attractant, the motility of the ΔdegS strain was found to be lower than that of the WT strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify this conjecture, we carried out swimming motility assays, and found that the diameter of the swimming zone of the degS mutant on motility plates was significantly smaller than that of the WT strain ( Figure 1B ; Supplementary Figure 1 ). Subsequently, we performed a chemotaxis assay using three widely utilized attractants, namely 50 mM fructose ( Liu et al, 2020b ), 100 mM serine ( l -ser; Roggo et al, 2018 ), and 100 μM aspartic acid ( l -Asp; Long et al, 2017 ). Either with or without attractant, the motility of the ΔdegS strain was found to be lower than that of the WT strain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cells cultured with different concentration of l ‐fucose (0.1, 1, 10, and 50 mM), the probability density of cells near the surface gradually increased with the concentration of l ‐fucose (Figure 4), suggesting that l ‐fucose promotes bacterial surface aggregation. Recent studies showed that the decrease of motor rotation speed would further promote the accumulation of bacteria near the surface [28,29]. Combined with the result above that the flagellar motor rotation speed of E. coli cultured with l ‐fucose reduced, the results indicate the l ‐fucose promotes bacterial surface aggregation by decreasing the motor rotation speed of bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…the '-' in the box represents the median value, and the whiskers represents the data range of the 25th and 75th percentile probability density of cells near the surface gradually increased with the concentration of L-fucose (Figure 4), suggesting that L-fucose promotes bacterial surface aggregation. Recent studies showed that the decrease of motor rotation speed would further promote the accumulation of bacteria near the surface [28,29].…”
Section: L-fucose Promotes Bacterial Surface Aggregation and Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%