2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Chinese rice wine taste attributes using liquid chromatographic analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, CRW is made from glutinous rice, wheat Qu and yeast using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Glutinous rice has relatively higher amylopectin content . Wheat Qu, made from wheat, is used as the source of both microbes and enzymes in a semi‐solid or solid state .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, CRW is made from glutinous rice, wheat Qu and yeast using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Glutinous rice has relatively higher amylopectin content . Wheat Qu, made from wheat, is used as the source of both microbes and enzymes in a semi‐solid or solid state .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wine quality is affected by many physicochemical indicators, such as phenolic compounds (Weingerl, Strlič, & Kočar, ), amines (Manetta et al, ), anthocyanin (Avizcuri, Saenz‐Navajas, Echavarri, Ferreira, & Fernandez‐Zurbano, ), bitterness (Ferrer‐Gallego, Hernández‐Hierro, Rivas‐Gonzalo, & Escribano‐Bailón, ), lees (Dimou et al, ), and food additive content (Amidzic Klaric, Klaric, Mornar, & Nigovic, 2015). These physicochemical wine indicators can be tested with the help of machinery such as an electronic tongue (Yu et al, ), an electronic nose (Prieto et al, ), and a spectroanalysis instrument (Castro Grijalba, Fiorentini, Martinez, & Wuilloud, 2016; Wu et al, ). Physicochemical tests cannot directly reflect wine quality or sensorium, nor can it fully explain the interaction between various physicochemical indicators.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently used evaluation methods include cluster analysis (Kuo, Su, Zulvia, & Lin, ; Płotka‐Wasylka, Simeonov, & Namieśnik, ; Srivastava, Mishra, & Mishra, ), principal component analysis (Carvalho, Pereira, Pereira, Pinto, & Marques, ; Giovenzana, Civelli, Beghi, Oberti, & Guidetti, ; Lv et al, ), neural network (Huang, Liu, & Ren, ; Jeswal & Chakraverty, ; King & Shellie, ), and sensory evaluation (Diako, Vixie, Weller, Dycus, & Ross, ; Tomadoni, Moreira, Pereda, & Ponce, ; Yu, Zhao, Li, Tian, & Ma, ). Płotka‐Wasylka et al () characterized the fruits used for wine‐making using cluster analysis, which is a traditional technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E‐nose has realized the evaluation of the typical volatile compounds content in food through multiple sensors, while E‐tongue uses artificial lipid membrane technology to evaluate the sensory indexes of food digitally, which has the advantages of high accuracy and repeatability (Di Rosa, Leone, Cheli, & Chiofalo, 2017; Loutfi, Coradeschi, Mani, Shankar, & Rayappan, 2015). The combination of these two technologies is also widely used in the quality evaluation of wine (Rodriguez‐Mendez et al., 2014), beer (Nery & Kubota, 2016), and yellow rice wine (Yu, Zhao, Li, Tian, & Ma, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%