2017
DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s132909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of cortical source generators based on electroencephalography during tonic pain

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to characterize the cortical source generators evoked by experimental tonic pain.MethodsElectroencephalography (EEG) was recorded on two separate days during rest and with immersion of the hand in ice water for 2 minutes (cold pressor test). Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography source localization was performed in 31 healthy volunteers to characterize the cortical source generators.ResultsReliability was high in all eight frequency bands during rest an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in patients older than 60 years of age, a diagnosis of SCH poses a challenge whether this change is a normal adaptive response associated with senescence or reflects an actual increase in abnormal function requires further study. Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-c levels are two important factors that contribute to the association between hypothyroidism and CHD [3, 36-38], and our results are in accordance with previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, in patients older than 60 years of age, a diagnosis of SCH poses a challenge whether this change is a normal adaptive response associated with senescence or reflects an actual increase in abnormal function requires further study. Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-c levels are two important factors that contribute to the association between hypothyroidism and CHD [3, 36-38], and our results are in accordance with previous findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar results of increased prefrontal gamma activity were reported in chronic back pain patients ( May et al, 2019 ) and patients with postherpetic neuralgia and fibromyalgia ( Lim et al, 2016 ; Zhou et al, 2018 ). The association between gamma oscillations and involuntary attentional effects of pain has been well described in literature ( Hauck et al, 2007 ; Tiemann et al, 2010 ; Schulz et al, 2015 ; Hansen et al, 2017 ) and has great relevance in cortical networks for behavioral and cognitive phenomena ( Uhlhaas et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A popular approach to estimate the brain sources from scalp EEG data is by low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) (Babiloni et al, 2017;Pascual-Marqui et al, 1999). This method and its standardized (sLORETA) and exact (eLORETA) variants have been used to characterize the brain activity through the estimation of intracranial current source density (CSD), and localize sources in pain studies (González-Roldán, Cifre, Sitges, & Montoya, 2016;Hansen et al, 2017;Lelic, Hansen, Mark, Olesen, & Drewes, 2017;Moont, Crispel, Lev, Pud, & Yarnitsky, 2011;Nir, Sinai, Moont, Harari, & Yarnitsky, 2012;Shao, Shen, Yu, Wilder-Smith, & Li, 2012). This family of methods have been validated with standard methods for source localization, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) (Cannon, Kerson, & Hampshire, 2011;Michel & Murray, 2012;Oakes et al, 2004;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to constitute a robust biomarker, a measurement must be valid but also reliable, that is, its variability must be sufficiently low across experimental conditions (subjects, sessions, assessors) when experimental or clinical conditions remain unchanged (Downing, 2004). While test-retest reliability of LORETA studies was examined in different settings, for example during resting EEG (Cannon et al, 2012) and superficial painful stimulation (Hansen et al, 2017), the interpretation of the outcomes is usually carried out in oversimplified, binary terms, that is, the measurement is deemed reliable or not based on a comparison with a fixed threshold set using arbitrary criteria, which can be misleading if data and results are not critically assessed (Biurrun Manresa et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%