2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.12.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of crosslinked hollow fiber membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive effect of temperature (factor A) on both responses is expected as increasing the temperature generally leads to higher crosslinking degrees [40,41].…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factors Using Doementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A positive effect of temperature (factor A) on both responses is expected as increasing the temperature generally leads to higher crosslinking degrees [40,41].…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factors Using Doementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It enhances the separation properties of the membrane for natural gas separation [111,112] and increases the pressure at which plasticization occurs. It makes membranes more stable at the higher partial pressure of CO 2 .…”
Section: Cross-linking and Thermal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that th skin layer and most productive hollow fibers. Therefore, reformulated so that the defect-free skin layer thickness can be reduced to the desired consistent with the correct binodal shown in Fig. By setting the dope composition closer to the and rapid phase separation is possible viscosity closer to thick honey when heated up to the spinning temperature nature of polymer solutions and multiple requirements that must be met require considerable trial and error in dope development to described in detail in following sections 14 Ternary phase diagram depicting the binodal (blue line) of PDMC polymer/solvent/non solvent system and dope composition in Section 4.1 (point a) and reformulated dope composition previous section, spinning condition optimizations enabled creation of defect free hollow fibers. However, the hollow fibers showed some evidence for substructure resistance thin skin layer (~0.1 µm) using the same dope composition in suggests that the dope composition may be not optimal to make the thinnest skin layer and most productive hollow fibers.…”
Section: Phase Separation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing the skin layer thickness to improve permeance is challenging, due to greater tendency for skin defects with low selectivity, for such membranes with thin selective layers. Although post-treatment with silicon rubber can cure small skin defects for less aggressive feeds, it tends to cause instability under aggressive feeds at high pressures and with high concentrations of CO 2 [14]. This fact motivates the development of thin-skinned intrinsically defect-free hollow fiber membranes for challenging gas separations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%