2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of crystal growth using a spiral nucleation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 that the overall activation energy do not vary significantly over the temperature and supersaturation ranges. From our previous study with sucrose at 40 ºC, one can estimate 14 c G kT Δ ≈ for S=0.1 [11], which is of the same order of magnitude of estimations of 24 W kT ≈ [22]. In these cases of high energetic barrier for spiral nucleation, the importance of the interfacial tension on the growth kinetics is also higher.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…20 that the overall activation energy do not vary significantly over the temperature and supersaturation ranges. From our previous study with sucrose at 40 ºC, one can estimate 14 c G kT Δ ≈ for S=0.1 [11], which is of the same order of magnitude of estimations of 24 W kT ≈ [22]. In these cases of high energetic barrier for spiral nucleation, the importance of the interfacial tension on the growth kinetics is also higher.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In this concern, the interfacial tension, γ is normally thought to decrease linearly with T (Eötvös rule) [21], while the following ( ) S γ function results from the SNM, when the condition of constant growth kinetic order over the supersaturation range is observed [11]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As previously stated by us for the case of crystal growth from solution (49 -51), the attachment probability linearly increases with (i) supersaturation , which drives the diffusion of molecules toward the interface; and with (ii) the number of energetically favorable sites for integration. The later quantity was found to be proportional to crystal size during crystallization (49) and is here assumed to be proportional to the length of amyloid fibrils L or, more specifically, to the number of ␤-sheets constituting the solid phase. We depart from a nonactive binding mechanism, where the lateral binding of monomers is seen as a dynamic reservoir for their subsequent incorporation at both ends of the fibrils (52,53) (Fig.…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%