2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Dendritic Cells Subpopulations in Skin and Afferent Lymph in the Swine Model

Abstract: Transcutaneous delivery of vaccines to specific skin dendritic cells (DC) subsets is foreseen as a promising strategy to induce strong and specific types of immune responses such as tolerance, cytotoxicity or humoral immunity. Because of striking histological similarities between human and pig skin, pig is recognized as the most suitable model to study the cutaneous delivery of medicine. Therefore improving the knowledge on swine skin DC subsets would be highly valuable to the skin vaccine field. In this study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In pig and macaques, cDC1 were the only cells to strongly express CADM1. In macaques, cDC1 were also XCR1 positive and expressed CLEC9A and BATF3 at the RNA level; similar to human cDC1, they also strongly expressed CD205 and CD162 and were responsive to TLR3 triggering [75,76]. cDC that closely resemble cDC1 in terms of FLT3, CADM1, CD205, TLR3 and XCR1 expression, were also identified for the first time in a non-mammalian species, the chicken [77].…”
Section: Xcr1 + Cadm1 + Cdc1 Across Speciesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pig and macaques, cDC1 were the only cells to strongly express CADM1. In macaques, cDC1 were also XCR1 positive and expressed CLEC9A and BATF3 at the RNA level; similar to human cDC1, they also strongly expressed CD205 and CD162 and were responsive to TLR3 triggering [75,76]. cDC that closely resemble cDC1 in terms of FLT3, CADM1, CD205, TLR3 and XCR1 expression, were also identified for the first time in a non-mammalian species, the chicken [77].…”
Section: Xcr1 + Cadm1 + Cdc1 Across Speciesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Very recently, DC sharing phenotypic, molecular and functional similarities to mouse, human and sheep cDC1 were defined in other species including macaques, pigs and chickens [75,76]. In pig and macaques, cDC1 were the only cells to strongly express CADM1.…”
Section: Xcr1 + Cadm1 + Cdc1 Across Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The scavenger receptors, CD163 and CD204, are also expressed by DC subsets in some species. 43,87 Expression patterns of CD163 and CD204 in normal canine DCs have not been reported. Of the markers mentioned, only CD11b is not assessable in formalin-fixed tissues.…”
Section: Histiocytic Diseases Of Interstitial DC and Macrophage Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Macrophage scavenger receptors are present on subsets of interstitial DCs, so this could be one potential point of reconciliation of the divergent data. 43,87 Also, dendritic cells are located in the meninges and choroid plexi but not in the brain. 19 Hence, the apparent site of initiation of CNS HS does have a resident population of interstitial DCs from which HS could develop.…”
Section: Distinctive Histiocytic Sarcoma Syndromesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most systems used to investigate DC-T cell interactions rely on the isolation of monocytes or macrophages from blood or tissues (such as spleen or bone marrow) (63,71), followed by maturation with interleukin 4 (IL-4) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or the harvesting of tissues followed by isolation of resident DC. Only the model of cannulation of lymphatic vessels provides biological material, including DC derived from anatomical sites used in vaccination (31,32,34,49,68). Various DC models have been used to identify MVA-DC interactions to try to understand rMVA-induced immunogenicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%