2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2011.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of desiccant wheels with alternative materials at low regeneration temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details about the facility can be found in White et al [21]. Experimental results are provided in Section 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further details about the facility can be found in White et al [21]. Experimental results are provided in Section 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If face velocities are kept constant, increasing AR leads to an increase in process air flow rate but, on the other hand, a reduction in humidity ratio drop. Overall desiccant wheel performance is commonly described by the Moisture Removal Capacity (MRC), which is an indicator to assess the latent cooling provided [1,21,29]. The effect on maximum MRC achievable (Eq.…”
Section: Desiccant Wheel Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the transport phenomena involved in such a processing technology is complicated. In a recent paper, it was found that dehumidification achieved by a zeolite desiccant wheel is generally less than that achieved by the silica gel desiccant wheel [1]. It was observed that the polymer desiccant shows much larger sorption capacity than silica gel at most relative humidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed that the polymer desiccant shows much larger sorption capacity than silica gel at most relative humidity. Furthermore, it was shown that the polymer desiccant has a higher regeneration rate than silica gel [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%