1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00317935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of discrete and continuous modes of visual pattern discrimination

Abstract: Abstract. Discrete and continuous modes of visual pattern discrimination performance are analyzed using a model for the investigation of discrete internal pattern representations described in previous papers (Foster, 1980a, b). A simple quantitative criterion is derived to characterize the two kinds of visual discrimination performance. Values predicted by this criterion are then compared with values obtained from experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the results of these post hoc analyses indicating the use of qualitatively invariant or quasi-invariant properties were essentially inferential, we have undertaken experiments to test their use explicitly. In previous work, Foster (1980a; Ferraro & Foster, 1984) has suggested that binary-valued cues (also called discrete attributes ) such as collinearity determine maxima in performance in some simple tasks requiring point-discrimination (Foster, 1979), angle-discrimination (Foster, 1980b), and curved-line discrimination (Foster, 1983). Pursuing this approach, we have used a perturbation technique (Foster, 1980b) that progressively distorted pairs of same patterns, degrading each qualitatively invariant property.…”
Section: Possible Strategies or Sources Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the results of these post hoc analyses indicating the use of qualitatively invariant or quasi-invariant properties were essentially inferential, we have undertaken experiments to test their use explicitly. In previous work, Foster (1980a; Ferraro & Foster, 1984) has suggested that binary-valued cues (also called discrete attributes ) such as collinearity determine maxima in performance in some simple tasks requiring point-discrimination (Foster, 1979), angle-discrimination (Foster, 1980b), and curved-line discrimination (Foster, 1983). Pursuing this approach, we have used a perturbation technique (Foster, 1980b) that progressively distorted pairs of same patterns, degrading each qualitatively invariant property.…”
Section: Possible Strategies or Sources Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a sharply peaked discrimination performance was associated with the use of coarse discrete encodings and a smoothly varying discrimination performance was associated with the use of fine-grained continuous encodings. A theoretical rationale for this interpretation has been given elsewhere (Foster, 1980b;Ferraro and Foster, 1984). *A portion of the data presented here was contained in a paper read at the Seventh European Conference on Visual Perception, Cambridge, UK, 31 August-3 September 1984. †To whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, in separate measurements of curved-line discrimination in which a range of ds values was used for long- and short-duration displays, the same pattern of performance (expressed as reciprocal spatial threshold) was obtained (Foster & Cook, 1989). Some analyses of size effects of ds have been considered in Ferraro and Foster (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Could the effects of reduced stimulus duration be regarded as a spatial threshold-scaling effect? That is, could the short-duration discrimination functions be brought into coincidence with the long-duration functions by scaling the parameter axis (expanding the long-duration one or contracting the short-duration one) according to some characteristic spatial threshold (see Ferraro & Foster, 1984, for related technical discussion)? Such a simple proposal is appealing, but may not suffice here, for the spatial thresholds under the two exposure conditions were not very different (and for one subject actually overlapped).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation