2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of drinking groundwater quality in rural areas of Inner Mongolia and assessment of human health risks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical parameters were also analyzed and the pH for the six water samples was observed to meet the predetermined standard with values ranging from 6.56 to 6.75. This is due to the fact that good drinking water is expected to range between 6 and 9 (WHO, 2011;Zhao et al, 2022) with those having less than 6 or greater than 9 perceived to be containing different chemical components that are detrimental to health. This is consistent with the opinion of Islam et al (2017) that drinking water needs to have a pH range of 6.5-8.5 in order to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chemical parameters were also analyzed and the pH for the six water samples was observed to meet the predetermined standard with values ranging from 6.56 to 6.75. This is due to the fact that good drinking water is expected to range between 6 and 9 (WHO, 2011;Zhao et al, 2022) with those having less than 6 or greater than 9 perceived to be containing different chemical components that are detrimental to health. This is consistent with the opinion of Islam et al (2017) that drinking water needs to have a pH range of 6.5-8.5 in order to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of infiltration water, the interaction between water and soil, and the rocks in contact with it in the unsaturated zone all have a significant impact on groundwater quality (Batabyal and Chakraborty, 2015;Gil-Doménech et al, 2018). Groundwater quality is also influenced by topography, lithology, hydrology, and climate (Zhao et al, 2022). Another researcher examined the drinking water quality of shallow groundwater in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi Province.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by the US EPA (1989), this study assessed only the non‐carcinogenic risk. The non‐carcinogenic risk was calculated by using Equations 2 and 3 (Kashyap et al 2018; Ravindra and Mor 2019; Zhao et al 2022): CDI=false(c×IR×EF×EDfalse)/false(BW×ATfalse) Where CDI denotes the daily average exposure dosage, mg/(kg × day); c and IR are the concentration of the pollutant (mg/L) and the drinking water intake rate (L/day); EF and ED are the exposure frequency (day/year) and the exposure duration (year); BW and AT ( AT = ED × 365) are the body weight (kg) and the average exposure time (day). According to the recommendations from technical guidelines (Ministry of Ecology and Environmental Protection of the P.R.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value THI > 4 of cumulative noncarcinogenic multiple contaminants from water indicate a high health risk, 4 > THI > 1 indicate a medium health risk, 0.1 < THI < 1 a low health risk, and for THI < 0.1 there is no health risk for the population [ 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%