2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2003.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of empirical discrepancy evaluation measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three reasons for choosing these algorithms: (1) they represent different approaches to the color edge detection problem, (2) which are based on enhancement and thresholding processes and (3) many of them have been used in previous studies [3,25,27,28,35]. In addition, as a reference point, the Sobel operator was applied to the average and monochromatic image I ¼ 1 3 ðR þ G þ BÞ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are three reasons for choosing these algorithms: (1) they represent different approaches to the color edge detection problem, (2) which are based on enhancement and thresholding processes and (3) many of them have been used in previous studies [3,25,27,28,35]. In addition, as a reference point, the Sobel operator was applied to the average and monochromatic image I ¼ 1 3 ðR þ G þ BÞ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of the image processing algorithms is essential to analyse newly proposed techniques and to improve the performance of real world applications of computer vision research [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(b) for an example), while the other set only imaged planes, and, therefore, implied less difficulty for detecting the correct edges for a strategy based on LOG zero-crossings. Besides, up to four empirical discrepancy evaluation measures were used to find the optimum values: the often-cited Pratt's figure of merit (FOM) [14] with (1) aZ1/9 and (2) aZ1; (3) the discrepancy percentage (D) [15,16]; and (4) the Baddeley measure [17], which was found the best evaluation technique in a recent survey [18] involving, among others, Pratt's FOM. In this way, the result of the experiment did not depend on the optimization strategy employed.…”
Section: Example Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…function's discontinuity (Fernandez-Garcia, & Medina-Carnicer 2004). Our method can have potential applications in video retrieval, and in other related areas of video information processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%