“…4(b) for an example), while the other set only imaged planes, and, therefore, implied less difficulty for detecting the correct edges for a strategy based on LOG zero-crossings. Besides, up to four empirical discrepancy evaluation measures were used to find the optimum values: the often-cited Pratt's figure of merit (FOM) [14] with (1) aZ1/9 and (2) aZ1; (3) the discrepancy percentage (D) [15,16]; and (4) the Baddeley measure [17], which was found the best evaluation technique in a recent survey [18] involving, among others, Pratt's FOM. In this way, the result of the experiment did not depend on the optimization strategy employed.…”