1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb13139.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of EP‐receptor subtypes involved in allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by intrathecal administration of prostaglandin E2 to mice

Abstract: 1 Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) to conscious mice induced allodynia, a state of discomfort and pain evoked by innocuous tactile stimuli, and hyperalgesia as assessed by the hot plate test. We characterized prostaglandin E receptor subtypes (EP,-3) involved in these sensory disorders by use of 7 synthetic prostanoid analogues.2 Sulprostone (EPI Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EP 1 is coupled to intracellular Ca 2ϩ mobilization, EP 2 and EP 4 are coupled to stimulation of adenylate cyclase via G s protein, and EP 3 is coupled to inhibition of adenylate cyclase via G i protein. Studies performed either in mutant mice lacking the individual PG receptors (Murata et al, 1997;Minami et al, 2001;Stock et al, 2001) or with synthetic EP receptor agonist/antagonist (Minami et al, 1994;Nakayama et al, 2002) have not yet provided a coherent picture of which EP receptors are responsible for inflammatory pain. Recently it has been reported that EP 4 knockdown with intrathecally delivered short hairpin RNA attenuates inflammation-induced thermal and mechanical behavioral hypersensitivity (Lin et al, 2006), suggesting that EP 4 is a potential target for the pharmacological treatment of inflammatory pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EP 1 is coupled to intracellular Ca 2ϩ mobilization, EP 2 and EP 4 are coupled to stimulation of adenylate cyclase via G s protein, and EP 3 is coupled to inhibition of adenylate cyclase via G i protein. Studies performed either in mutant mice lacking the individual PG receptors (Murata et al, 1997;Minami et al, 2001;Stock et al, 2001) or with synthetic EP receptor agonist/antagonist (Minami et al, 1994;Nakayama et al, 2002) have not yet provided a coherent picture of which EP receptors are responsible for inflammatory pain. Recently it has been reported that EP 4 knockdown with intrathecally delivered short hairpin RNA attenuates inflammation-induced thermal and mechanical behavioral hypersensitivity (Lin et al, 2006), suggesting that EP 4 is a potential target for the pharmacological treatment of inflammatory pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EP2 and EP4 are coupled to G s , some splice variants of EP3 are coupled to G s , and some are coupled to G i , whereas EP1 is coupled to G q /G11. Studies performed either in mutant mice lacking the individual PG receptors (Murata et al, 1997;Minami et al, 2001;Stock et al, 2001) or with EP receptorspecific ligands (Minami et al, 1994) have not yet provided a coherent picture of which EP receptor(s) are responsible for inflammatory pain. This is partly due to the fact that PGE 2 facilitates nociception at multiple levels in the neuraxis and that multiple receptors are involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synergistic action of N/OFQ and NST is really surprising; because studies reported on their opposite effects in several biological functions [3][4][5][6][7][8]22,23]. However these studies were carried out in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and gave no information about the peripheral interaction of these two neuropeptides.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…NST was thought to be a functional antagonist of N/OFQ on the basis of their effects in the central nervous system [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Although N/OFQ has no affinity to opiate receptors; interaction was reported between the N/OFQ and dynorphin in neuropathic pain [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%