2019
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2019.1590829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of failure mechanism in glass, carbon and their hybrid composite laminates in epoxy resin by acoustic emission monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also some studies on damage characterization of hybrid composite materials using the AE technique [35][36][37], showing the potential of this technique for hybrid configurations. Suresh Kumar et al [38] used AE amplitude, duration, counts, energy, rise angle (RA) and peak frequency for characterizing failure modes in hybrid composite laminates. The amount of indentation-induced damage was evaluated in different configurations of carbon, basalt and glass fibres using Sentry function (SF) and Felicity ratio (FR) and RA [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some studies on damage characterization of hybrid composite materials using the AE technique [35][36][37], showing the potential of this technique for hybrid configurations. Suresh Kumar et al [38] used AE amplitude, duration, counts, energy, rise angle (RA) and peak frequency for characterizing failure modes in hybrid composite laminates. The amount of indentation-induced damage was evaluated in different configurations of carbon, basalt and glass fibres using Sentry function (SF) and Felicity ratio (FR) and RA [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AE signal activity is more pronounced in the final stage of the compression test, which corresponds to fiber breakage. [ 39 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cluster 1 and cluster 3 are distributed in the range of 80-100 dB. [18,39] However, the number of events in cluster 3 is much greater than in cluster 1, and the events in cluster 3 are mainly distributed in 80-85 dB, while those in cluster 1 are mainly distributed in 95-100 dB. [18,21] The amplitude range of cluster 2 is mainly distributed in 70-80 dB.…”
Section: Analysis and Identification Of Damage Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal classification method is applicable to the failure analysis of carbon fiber and glass fiber under type I loading conditions. Most researchers use acoustic emission information to estimate some related material properties, such as ultimate strength, fracture toughness, residual strength after damage [21][22][23]. The regular classical method, based on empirical or semi-empirical formula, involves using mechanical parameters and acoustic emission information, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%