2013
DOI: 10.14359/51685530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Fly Ashes for Sulfate Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, 5% silica fume (SF) was used as part of a ternary blend with 35% HC fly ash. The HC fly ash had a CaO = 28.98% and is known to be susceptible to sulfate attack [6,7,[21][22][23]. The chemical composition of the cementitious materials, as well as the phase composition of the cements used is presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, 5% silica fume (SF) was used as part of a ternary blend with 35% HC fly ash. The HC fly ash had a CaO = 28.98% and is known to be susceptible to sulfate attack [6,7,[21][22][23]. The chemical composition of the cementitious materials, as well as the phase composition of the cements used is presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results suggest that the chemical composition of the mixtures prior to sulfate exposure could be affecting the performance. This is likely attributed to the reactive glassy phases and aluminates available to react in the fly ash mixture thus favoring the formation of ettringite at later ages [22]. Santhanam et al [33] modeled the effects of sodium sulfate concentrations on small mortars.…”
Section: C2 Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%