2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3975(97)00296-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Glushkov automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has many practical applications and is very simple for understanding and extension. In [4] the alternative automaton (known as a Glushkov automaton) was well-studied and characterized, obviously, Glushkov automaton can be constructed from Thompson's by applying the following-rule: This case has one more proof of Thompson's method of universality and applicability even for large cases as automaton has as fewer states as the input regular expression. For the follow automaton this bound is quadratic due to Kleene-star explosion.…”
Section: Known Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has many practical applications and is very simple for understanding and extension. In [4] the alternative automaton (known as a Glushkov automaton) was well-studied and characterized, obviously, Glushkov automaton can be constructed from Thompson's by applying the following-rule: This case has one more proof of Thompson's method of universality and applicability even for large cases as automaton has as fewer states as the input regular expression. For the follow automaton this bound is quadratic due to Kleene-star explosion.…”
Section: Known Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we assume that D is a DTD over the labels L and l ∈ L. There is a well-known process to transform a regular expression, such as e(l), into a Glushkov automaton [6]. We discuss this process briefly here.…”
Section: Graph Representation Of a Dtdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [27], Caron and Ziadi have described an algorithm, say Θ, which decides whether or not an automaton A is the standard automaton of an expression E; and if the answer is positive, Θ moreover computes an expression which is almost E, namely the star normal form of E as defined by Brüggemann-Klein [22]. Even if Θ is not properly a Φ-type algorithm since it does not compute an expression for every automaton, it holds:…”
Section: Can Expressions and Automata Code For Each Other?mentioning
confidence: 99%