2008
DOI: 10.1021/jf703788c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of High Purity Lycopene from Tomato Wastes Using a New Pressurized Extraction Approach

Abstract: In this paper, a method for the extraction of high purity lycopene from tomato wastes is presented. The method is based on a pressurized extraction that uses the Extractor Naviglio, and it is performed in the 0.7-0.9 MPa range. Tomato skin, the byproduct deriving from manufacturing of tomato, in a water dispersion, are used as starting material. Lycopene is transferred, for the effect of the high pressure used, in the form of molecular aggregates into the water as a dispersion, while apolar compounds remain in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity of the purified lycopene was confirmed and compared to a standard lycopene using thin layer chromatography, HPLC (methodology in “Lycopene analysis” ), UV‐Vis spectrophotometry (Hitachi, Pleasanton, CA) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (positive ionization mode, Waters TQD tandem quadrupole detector, Milford, MA). Purified and standard lycopene presented similar R f values in silica plates, and similar UV‐Vis spectra, with the characteristic absorption peaks at 504, 472, and 446 nm 17. The standard and purified lycopene exhibited similar retention times (9.4 min) when assayed by HPLC; the peak areas obtained when 1, 2, and 5 µg/mL solutions of the extracted lycopene were analyzed and were 20–25% smaller than those obtained after analysis of standards, suggesting that some degradation occurred during extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The identity of the purified lycopene was confirmed and compared to a standard lycopene using thin layer chromatography, HPLC (methodology in “Lycopene analysis” ), UV‐Vis spectrophotometry (Hitachi, Pleasanton, CA) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (positive ionization mode, Waters TQD tandem quadrupole detector, Milford, MA). Purified and standard lycopene presented similar R f values in silica plates, and similar UV‐Vis spectra, with the characteristic absorption peaks at 504, 472, and 446 nm 17. The standard and purified lycopene exhibited similar retention times (9.4 min) when assayed by HPLC; the peak areas obtained when 1, 2, and 5 µg/mL solutions of the extracted lycopene were analyzed and were 20–25% smaller than those obtained after analysis of standards, suggesting that some degradation occurred during extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The solvent was evaporated, and samples were re-dissolved in 3 mL of chloroform and submitted for analysis by means of reversed phase HPLC equipped with a MD-2010Plus photo-DAD (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) [40]. The column was a YMC C30 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm), for carotenoid analysis and eluents: (A) methanol/methilterbutilether/water (81/15/4) and (B) methanol/methilterbutilether/water (6/90/4), with a gradient from 1% to 100% of Solution B in 50 min and a mobile phase flow of 1 mL/min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standardizing the extraction time is a crucial parameter to obtain reproducibility in the quantity of drug extracted, as has been demonstrated in works reported in the literature [11]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%