“…The calculated value was lower than those of the rolled single α-phase Mg–Li alloy (211 kJ/mol) [ 24 ], as-cast LAZ532 (160 kJ/mol) [ 3 ], commercial AZ80 alloy (216 kJ/mol) [ 36 ], extruded-state α(Mg)–β(Li) duplex phase Mg–Li alloy (148 kJ/mol) [ 37 ], as-cast Mg–2 Zn–0.3 Zr–0.9 Y alloy (236.2 kJ/mol) [ 38 ], and as-cast Mg–3 Sn–Ca alloy (236 kJ/mol) [ 39 ]. Despite being related to the other Mg–Li alloys with α + β duplex phases or a single β -phase, the deformation activation energy in the presented work was higher than those of the as-cast α + β alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 40 ], the as-cast single β -phase Mg–Li alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 41 ], the as-cast Mg–8 Li–3 Al–2 Zn alloy modified with Zr (108 kJ/mol) [ 8 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–1 Zn alloy (127 kJ/mol) [ 42 ], the as-cast Mg–11.5 Li–1.5 Al alloy (95 kJ/mol) [ 43 ], the as-cast Mg–3 Sn–2 Al–1 Zn–5 Li (139 kJ/mol) [ 44 , 45 ], the as-cast Mg–9 Li–3 Al alloy with Sr addition (110 kJ/mol) [ 46 ], and as-cast LA43M (110 kJ/mol) [ 4 ].…”