2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of human female breast and abdominal skin elasticity using a bulge test.

Abstract: Characterization of material properties of human skin is required to develop a physics-based biomechanical model that can predict deformation of female breast after cosmetic and reconstructive surgery. In this paper, we have adopted an experimental approach to characterize the biaxial response of human skin using bulge tests. Skin specimens were harvested from breast and abdominal skin of female subjects who underwent mastectomy and/or reconstruction at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive work has been conducted for decades in order to characterise the elastic properties of soft tissues. The gold standard for ex vivo tissue characterization are based on conventional mechanical characterization technique such as uni or biaxial tensile tests [2][3][4][5][6], pure shear [5,7], plain strain compression [5], bulge tests [8,9], indentation [10,11] or suction [12]. If such traditional mechanical methods proved invaluable, most of them are destructive (the sample needs to be removed from the body) and cannot be used to characterise the mechanical behaviour in vivo (in situ analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive work has been conducted for decades in order to characterise the elastic properties of soft tissues. The gold standard for ex vivo tissue characterization are based on conventional mechanical characterization technique such as uni or biaxial tensile tests [2][3][4][5][6], pure shear [5,7], plain strain compression [5], bulge tests [8,9], indentation [10,11] or suction [12]. If such traditional mechanical methods proved invaluable, most of them are destructive (the sample needs to be removed from the body) and cannot be used to characterise the mechanical behaviour in vivo (in situ analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, understanding the mechanical behavior of skin at extensive stretching is essential. The bulge test method (Diab et al, 2020;Lakhani et al, 2020;Tonge et al, 2013) can apply load in all directions and overcome the limitation of small deformation but can only be used in ex vivo tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%