2018
DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.01621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Imprinted Genes in Rice Reveals Conservation of Regulation and Imprinting with Other Plant Species

Abstract: Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon by which certain genes display differential expression in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Hundreds of imprinted genes have been identified from several plant species. Here, we identified, with a high level of confidence, 208 imprinted gene candidates from rice (). Imprinted genes of rice showed limited association with the transposable elements, which contrasts with findings from Arabidopsis (). Generally, imprinting in rice is conserved within a species, but… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, parent-of-origin effects have been implicated in interspecific reproductive barriers (51, 52) with a high rate of diversifying evolution among plant species through genomic imprinting (53). However, imprinted expression is conserved in other genes across plant lineages, suggesting stabilizing selection for these loci (53,54).…”
Section: Maternal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, parent-of-origin effects have been implicated in interspecific reproductive barriers (51, 52) with a high rate of diversifying evolution among plant species through genomic imprinting (53). However, imprinted expression is conserved in other genes across plant lineages, suggesting stabilizing selection for these loci (53,54).…”
Section: Maternal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and rice(Folsom et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018) are imprinted. Therefore, we examined the DNA methylation status of MADS78 and MADS79.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicate that the number of co‐localized PPIs and the GO similarities of F 1 ‐specific PPIs are higher than those of any random network (empirical P < 0.001). Further, we examined the co‐expression of japonica and indica alleles from the genes involved in F 1 ‐specific PPIs by using the RNA‐seq data in accession of GS113769 (Chen et al , ) in NCBI GEO (Experimental Procedures). In http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113769, the RNA‐seq samples were collected from the endosperm tissues of F 1 hybrids generated from two distinct, reciprocal crosses of japonica and indica rice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the number of co‐localized PPIs and the GO similarities between F 1 ‐specific PPIs and randomly generated PPIs were compared. We downloaded previously published RNA‐seq dataset of japonica × indica F 1 hybrids profiled in endosperm from NCBI GEO http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113769 (Chen et al , ). Based on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE113769, the co‐expression of japonica and indica alleles from the genes involved in F 1 ‐specific PPIs can be verified by using the SNPs between japonica and indica , which can be used to differentiate allelic expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%