2006
DOI: 10.1637/7447-092605r.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Infectious Bursal Disease Viruses from Argentina

Abstract: Infectious bursal disease (IBD) viruses detected in commercial flocks of different regions of Argentina were analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of a VP2 gene fragment, followed by sequence analysis. Two out of eight IBD viruses presented an SspI restriction site, typical of the very virulent phenotype. Three IBD viruses presented a SacI restriction site, typical of classic virulent strains, and one isolate presented restriction sites for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the genetic analysis cannot accurately assign this group of viruses, here denoted as dIBDVs, to the typical c, ca, va and vv strains. These Uruguayan and Argentine dIBDVs are included in an independent evolutionary lineage with previously reported viruses from other countries in America (Jackwood & Sommer, 1997;Ikuta et al, 2001;Banda et al, 2003;Remorini et al, 2006;Jackwood & Sommer-Wagner, 2007;Ojkic et al, 2007), Europe (Domanska et al, 2004) and Asia (Kwon et al, 2000) (Figure 2). The hvVP2 Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the genetic analysis cannot accurately assign this group of viruses, here denoted as dIBDVs, to the typical c, ca, va and vv strains. These Uruguayan and Argentine dIBDVs are included in an independent evolutionary lineage with previously reported viruses from other countries in America (Jackwood & Sommer, 1997;Ikuta et al, 2001;Banda et al, 2003;Remorini et al, 2006;Jackwood & Sommer-Wagner, 2007;Ojkic et al, 2007), Europe (Domanska et al, 2004) and Asia (Kwon et al, 2000) (Figure 2). The hvVP2 Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Isolated IBDVs with different traits than the traditional strains have also been sporadically reported through the years in different parts of the world (Ikuta et al, 2001;Domanska et al, 2004;Remorini et al, 2006;Jackwood & Sommer-Wagner, 2007). These IBDVs have been generally considered atypical isolates or variants that have evolved in restricted geographic regions or during short periods of time under particular conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those residues were present in four sequences reported in a previous study on Argentinean IBDV isolates [47]. In that report, the samples S002 (GenBank accession number AM084688), S003 (accession number AM084689), B641A34 (accession number AM084695), and P30903 (accession number AM084694) contained the residues characteristic of the Argentinean lineage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…By analysing the hvVP2 sequences available in the GenBank, we inferred that more than 10% of the IBDV sequences correspond to dIBDVs, suggesting a high frequency of this lineage in the global virus population. Countries such as Argentina, Canada and Uruguay have reported a high prevalence of this lineage circulating in the poultry production, while in countries such as Brazil, Colombia, Hungary, Poland, Puerto Rico, Russia, South Korea and the United States, there are only sporadic reports of dIBDVs (Shcherbakova et al, 1998;Kwon et al, 2000;Ikuta et al, 2001;Jackwood et al, 2001;Smiley & Jackwood, 2001;Domanska et al, 2004;Remorini et al, 2006;Jackwood & Sommer-Wagner, 2007;Ojkic et al, 2007;Hernández et al, 2015;Tomás et al, 2015;Vera et al, 2015). This uneven prevalence among different countries needs to be confirmed by performing more extensive studies with a specific diagnostic method, taking into consideration that dIBDVs can be easily ignored during routine surveillance due to the apparent lack of differential clinical signs (Ikuta et al, 2001;Domanska et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lineage is resolved in a well-supported clade and has a unique four-aminoacid signature (T272, P289, I290, F296). Most isolates that are now classified as dIBDV were initially considered atypical classic or variant strains that harboured unique nucleotide and amino acid changes as a consequence of local differentiation (Kwon et al, 2000;Ikuta et al, 2001;Domanska et al, 2004;Remorini et al, 2006;Jackwood & Sommer-Wagner, 2007;Ojkic et al, 2007). Some dIBDV isolates have exhibited mild clinical signs and antigenic differences (Ikuta et al, 2001;Domanska et al, 2004;Vera et al, 2015) but further phenotypic studies are needed to understand the epidemiological and sanitary relevance of this lineage that contains part of the genetic variability of the virus (Hernández et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%