2012
DOI: 10.4038/tar.v23i3.4661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of Irrigation Water Quality of Chunnakam Aquifer in Jaffna Peninsula

Abstract: Chunnakam aquifer is the main lime stone aquifer of Jaffna Peninsula. This study focused on characterization of Chunnakam aquifer for its suitability for irrigation. Groundwater samples were collected from wells to represent different uses such as domestic, domestic with home garden, public wells and farm wells during January to April 2011. Important chemical parameters, namely electrical conductivity (EC), chloride, calcium, magnesium, carbonate, bicarbonate, sulfate, sodium and potassium were determined in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher water table fluctuation impacts the salinity of groundwater in the region. Figure 7 shows the mapping of electrical conductivity (EC) in the Jaffna peninsula (based on the study conducted by (Sutharsiny et al 2012)) for different months of the year. The EC, which can be taken as a proxy of salinity in the groundwater, is restricted to the coastal areas for the months of January, March, and April but spreads rapidly inland by July and even more in October.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher water table fluctuation impacts the salinity of groundwater in the region. Figure 7 shows the mapping of electrical conductivity (EC) in the Jaffna peninsula (based on the study conducted by (Sutharsiny et al 2012)) for different months of the year. The EC, which can be taken as a proxy of salinity in the groundwater, is restricted to the coastal areas for the months of January, March, and April but spreads rapidly inland by July and even more in October.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the EC iw values for GW + DW and GW + DW + TTWW were higher than the critical level. The data presented in Table III revealed that the SAR value of all water sources is relatively low in comparison with the critical level of sodium hazard (less than 10) as reported by FAO (1976) and Sutharsiny et al (2012). The SSP values in all types of water were less than the critical limit (<60%).…”
Section: Water Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The found pH values for the studied groundwater lie in a safe range of pH (6.5 -8.4). The pH of groundwater typically ranges from about 6.5 to 8.5, depending on the type of soil and rock that has reacted with the groundwater (Sutharsiny et al, 2012). So, the examined groundwater is suitable for irrigation without danger of pH on either soil or plant (Ayers and Westcot, 1985).…”
Section: Water Ph and Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%