2011
DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvr112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Characterization of kinase inhibitors using different phosphorylation states of colony stimulating factor-1 receptor tyrosine kinase

Abstract: It is known that some kinase inhibitors are sensitive to the phosphorylation state of the kinase, and therefore those compounds can discriminate between a phosphorylated and unphosphorylated protein. In this study, we prepared two colony stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) tyrosine kinase proteins: one highly phosphorylated by autophosphorylation and the other dephosphorylated by phosphatase treatment. These kinases were subjected to an activity-based assay to investigate the effect of their phosphorylation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may include the polarization of TAM, as inhibition of NF‐κB in TAM has been reported to induce antitumoral immune responses 23. Sorafenib targets, such as the CSF‐receptor‐1,24 MAPKp38,12 and JAK/STAT,25 which are pivotal for Mϕ maturation, support this finding 26‐28. Sorafenib‐mediated cytokine induction in polarized Mϕ might therefore rely on complex signaling networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This may include the polarization of TAM, as inhibition of NF‐κB in TAM has been reported to induce antitumoral immune responses 23. Sorafenib targets, such as the CSF‐receptor‐1,24 MAPKp38,12 and JAK/STAT,25 which are pivotal for Mϕ maturation, support this finding 26‐28. Sorafenib‐mediated cytokine induction in polarized Mϕ might therefore rely on complex signaling networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…) and FMS (Kitagawa et al . ), indicating that the type I (ATP‐competitive) kinase inhibitors binds preferentially inactive form of some kinases. A concurrent profiling assay using inactive kinases may be advisable to generate comprehensive data regarding compound affinity for targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, imatinib and nilotinib are classified as inhibitors of inactive kinases (type II inhibitors), in contrast to sunitinib, which is an inhibitor of active kinases (type I inhibitor). Sunitinib, however, has demonstrated to have high affinity to a members of the PDGFR family kinases and bind preferentially to the inactive forms of KIT (Quintas-Cardama & Cortes 2008;Gajiwala et al 2009) and FMS (Kitagawa et al 2012), indicating that the type I (ATP-competitive) kinase inhibitors binds preferentially inactive form of some kinases. A concurrent profiling assay using inactive kinases may be advisable to generate comprehensive data regarding compound affinity for targets.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzymatic activity of TNIK was measured by mobility shift assay52 using a QuickScout Screening Assist Kit (07-138MS, Carna Biosciences). The reaction product was quantified using a LabChip EZ Reader II (PerkinElmer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%